Tim Walz Refers to Elon Musk as ‘That Gay Guy’ at Rally Minnesota Governor Tim Walz stirred controversy during a recent rally by referring to Elon Musk as “that gay guy.” This remark, meant as a joke, left many wondering about the appropriateness of using such language about one of the world’s most influential tech innovators.
Biden’s MAGA Republican Comment: ‘The Kind of Guys You’d Like to Smack in the Ass’ President Biden doubled down on his criticism of MAGA Republicans, remarking that they’re “the kind of guys you’d like to smack in the ass.” The controversial statement is raising eyebrows and sparking conversations about his communication strategy with conservative voters.
Is Tim Walz a Manchurian Candidate? An eleventh-hour discovery raises questions about Walz’s loyalty to conservative values. Dubbed a “Manchurian Candidate” by critics, Walz faces skepticism over his alignment with progressive interests. This topic is unfolding just as the election nears, adding fuel to the fire for both critics and supporters.
Absentee Ballots Missing for Active Military Reports have surfaced of absentee ballots failing to reach active-duty military service members on time, potentially silencing thousands of crucial voices in this election. The Pentagon has not fully addressed the situation, leading to increased frustration and demands for accountability.
Donald Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS Former President Donald Trump has filed a staggering $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News, alleging “deceptive” editing of a recent Kamala Harris interview. The legal battle could set a precedent for how media covers political figures and how interviews are edited for public consumption.
Cardi B’s Unlikely Endorsement for Kamala Harris Rapper Cardi B endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, citing rising grocery prices as her main reason. Her unusual endorsement sheds light on how everyday issues are influencing public figures to engage with political campaigns in unexpected ways.
Harris Dodges Questions on Crime Vote Record Vice President Harris sidestepped questions about her vote history on California’s tough-on-crime ballot measures. Her stance is leaving many wondering where she stands on crime issues as her record faces renewed scrutiny.
Hour 2
Raskin’s Comments Undermine His Party’s Case Against Trump on January 6 Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin delivered remarks that inadvertently weakened his party’s case against Trump’s involvement on January 6. With the hearing’s attention increasing, Raskin’s statement is shaking up the narrative.
Biden’s ‘Garbage’ Comment About Trump Voters Costs Campaign Calls Biden’s recent comment, referring to Trump supporters as “garbage,” has caused a wave of canceled campaign calls, especially in swing states. These cancellations highlight the deepening divide within the Democratic voter base.
Kamala’s Pro-Israel and Ceasefire Ads: A State-by-State Strategy CNN recently uncovered the Harris campaign’s strategy of tailoring ads by state, running both pro-Israel and ceasefire messaging. The approach is stirring up debate on how far campaigns should go to appeal to varied demographics within a single nation.
Fact-Check: Mark Ruffalo’s Trump Hoaxes Actor Mark Ruffalo cited Trump “hoaxes” like “inject bleach” and the “Muslim ban.” We dissect these claims, sorting fact from fiction, and analyze the media’s role in perpetuating these misunderstandings.
Ana Navarro’s Shocking Trump Microphone Video Political commentator Ana Navarro recently posted a video supposedly showing Trump in a compromising situation with a microphone. The clip has sparked outrage, yet questions about its authenticity and context are being raised.
Kamala’s Campaign’s Alleged Internet Manipulation Reports allege that the Harris-Walz social media team is using questionable tactics to silence critics online while boosting positive comments and engagement. Is this a case of digital manipulation, or simply clever marketing?
Hour 3
Voting Machine Malfunction Highlights Harris on Trump Selection In a Kentucky county, voters reported that selecting Trump highlighted Harris’s name due to a malfunction. The incident has caused concern among local voters and election officials about the accuracy of electronic voting machines.
Arizona’s Voter Citizenship Proof Controversy A judge ordered Arizona’s election officials to release the names of 218,000 voters who lack proof of citizenship. The ruling intensifies the focus on election integrity, especially as more questions about eligibility arise.
Nevada Supreme Court Rules on Postmark-Less Ballots The Nevada Supreme Court decided that ballots without postmarks can still be counted if received up to three days after Election Day. This ruling has drawn both support and criticism from various political groups, each citing the impact on voter turnout and election fairness.
Patriotic Memes Featuring Peanut the Squirrel In a lighthearted turn, we celebrate Peanut the Squirrel, the internet sensation known for inspiring patriotic memes. As Election Day approaches, Peanut’s story has become a symbol of American resilience and the lighter side of election season.
After Deputies Took Her Pet Goat to the Butcher, Girl Wins $300,000 In a touching win for animal lovers, a young girl received $300,000 in compensation after deputies mistakenly butchered her pet goat. This unique case sheds light on property rights and the emotional bonds we form with our animals.
Chinese Immigrant Debates Liberal Opponent in New Hampshire An immigrant who survived Chinese communism has taken a strong stand against her wealthy liberal opponent in New Hampshire. The debate has garnered national attention as her personal experience adds a powerful layer to her campaign.
Conclusion In today’s Daily Show Prep, Casey Hendrickson explored the top political and social stories making waves across America. From Biden’s verbal jabs to allegations of election manipulation, and the surprising endorsements from unlikely celebrities, today’s episode was packed with content to keep listeners informed and engaged. Check back for more insightful updates in tomorrow’s show prep!
When a senior judge from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, David McKeague, concluded in his judicial opinion that “in defiance of the U.S. Constitution and state election law, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson manipulated the presidential ballot in Michigan.”
The latest Daily Show Prep: Thursday, Oct. 24 dives deep into the recent media frenzy with a focus on debunking yet another Trump hit piece. This time, the Atlantic tried to smear Donald Trump with a false narrative about his military stance. But thanks to insider accounts, including those from former officials, the story has been thoroughly debunked. Even Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff stepped in to call out the falsehoods surrounding General Kelly’s statements. This breakdown offers a clear view of how the media continues to push these hit pieces without verifying facts. (Designed by AIPRM).
Pence’s Chief of Staff Debunks Trump Military Story
A key piece of evidence in this Trump hit piece debunked story comes from Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff. He publicly refuted General Kelly’s claims, stating outright that the narrative pushed by the Atlantic is entirely fabricated. In a world where fact-checking seems to be optional, it’s refreshing to see high-level officials standing up for the truth. The media’s role in spreading unverified information about Trump’s stance on the military has been under fire, and this new evidence only adds to the pressure.
9 in 10 Voters Demand Kamala Harris Transcript
Alongside the Trump hit piece debunked, the spotlight is also on CBS and its recent interview with Kamala Harris. Polls indicate that 9 out of 10 voters want the full transcript of her interview released. Trump is even considering suing CBS if the network refuses to release the entire interview. This comes after the FCC Commissioner hinted at a potential probe into CBS over the distortions made during the interview. The constant media manipulations, from Trump to Harris, are becoming clearer by the day.
Trump to Sue CBS Over Interview Manipulation?
Another important revelation in Trump hit piece debunked is Trump’s potential lawsuit against CBS. The network is accused of distorting his interview with Kamala Harris, leaving out key details that could swing public opinion. Trump is no stranger to legal battles, and this time he’s taking aim at media giants who continue to mislead the public. It’s a battle over transparency, and Trump isn’t backing down without a fight.
Harris Struggles with Word Salad Once Again
In a now-infamous CNN Town Hall, Kamala Harris fell into what many are calling “Word Salad City.” This latest blunder has only fueled public frustration. Paired with Liz Cheney’s dwindling political capital, the political landscape continues to shift. The Trump hit piece debunked reminds readers that the media isn’t just failing on Trump’s front, but also on accurately portraying Harris’ repeated stumbles during key moments.
MSNBC Fails to Push Racism Narrative with Black Voters
The Trump hit piece debunked post also highlights MSNBC’s failed attempt to stir the pot with Black women voters. The network’s push to frame certain issues as race-related didn’t resonate with the very group they were targeting. Voters are becoming increasingly savvy to media manipulation, and this recent failure only cements that notion. The lack of traction for these narratives showcases a growing demand for authentic reporting rather than manufactured outrage.
Veteran Kicked Off Delta Flight Sparks Outrage
Rounding off the Trump hit piece debunked, a story that is grabbing headlines involves a veteran who was kicked off a Delta flight for wearing a shirt advocating for suicide awareness among veterans. This incident has caused public outrage, raising questions about corporate policies and the treatment of those who have served. It’s yet another example of how social issues are intertwined with media narratives and how public opinion is often shaped by incomplete stories.
In conclusion, the latest issue of Daily Show Prep on Thursday, Oct. 24, effectively dismantles the recent media frenzy surrounding another Trump hit piece. By examining the facts and providing clarity, the show reinforces the importance of critical thinking in today’s media landscape. For those seeking to stay informed and engaged, be sure to follow my social media accounts for updates, insights, and more discussions on the pressing issues of our time. Join the conversation and empower yourself with the truth.
I told you on my show the Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the South Bend Police Department (and the city) for alleged violations of Title VII.
The reasons listed by the Biden/Harris administration are that the SBPD requires a physical and written exam to apply to become a police officer. The government says this is not necessary for the job’s duties. That’s obviously insane.
Here’s the SBPD’s response:
The City of South Bend will vigorously defend a lawsuit filed today by the Department of Justice, which accuses the City’s Police Department of unlawful hiring practices.
The City learned of the filing through the DOJ’s press release and has not yet been formally served with the Complaint. Based on a preliminary review, the DOJ is not accusing the City of intentional discrimination. Instead, the lawsuit claims that the City Police Department’s hiring process and testing for new officers has had a disparate impact on female and African American applicants.
The City has consistently sought to build a diverse workforce, while it fulfills the requirements of state law, and makes sure that applicants can perform the job responsibilities of a South Bend police officer.
The South Bend Police Department believes its screening process fairly measures a candidate’s ability to perform the job. Like every other city in Indiana, South Bend must ensure its officers meet certain minimum criteria. Unlike every city in Indiana, South Bend allows every applicant multiple attempts at the physical examination per hiring cycle.
In its lawsuit, the DOJ accuses the SBPD of requiring a physical test that allegedly disproportionately screens women. However, the City’s requirements are consistent with the ILEA, the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (an agency created by Indiana law), which sets the minimum physical standards for police officers in Indiana.
The DOJ’s lawsuit also attacks the SBPD’s written test, which is administered by an outside firm and is similar to written tests in other Indiana police departments, including the Indiana State Police. South Bend has regularly evaluated its written test to make sure it is fair and non-biased. Importantly, all SBPD applicants are invited to free tutoring sessions to prepare for the written test.
SBPD is confident that its standard applicant process results in high quality officers to protect and serve the City.
“I am beyond disappointed that the DOJ has not been forthcoming with how these claims were determined in the first place,” said South Bend Police Chief Scott Ruszkowski. “Our hiring process, which includes females and African American applicants, has been consistent over the last ten years and led to an increasingly diverse department, especially over the past several years. We have even asked the outside testing company to modify the written test to open the process to more applicants. We are, and have been, very transparent and inclusive in our hiring process. All requirements are listed online and meet State mandates, and more importantly, meet what our community expects in a professional police officer.”
From 2017 to 2023, SBPD hired 15 female officers and 29 officers of color, accounting for 12.6% and 24.4% of all new officers, respectively. Currently, 9.9% of all officers are females and 11.5% of all officers are black – the highest percentage of black officers since at least 2012. Nationally, female officers make up 13.5% of local police departments and black officers make up 11.6%.[1]
The City, which has been cooperating with the DOJ during its investigation, believes the DOJ’s lawsuit ignores the City’s obligations to comply with state law, will cause a delay in the City’s hiring processes, and amounts to a waste of taxpayer resources.
“The City is committed to recruiting a workforce that represents the community we serve, and the City is proud of the progress we have made over the past several years,” said Mayor James Mueller. “Our police department has worked diligently to increase the number of officers from underrepresented groups and to follow the letter and spirit of Indiana and federal law. Although the costs of this targeted litigation will be borne by federal and local taxpayers, the City will not voluntarily agree to federal control. We hope that common sense will prevail during the judicial process.”
[1] Local Police Departments Personnel, 2020. United States Department of Justice, November 2022.
City of South Bend
The City of South Bend gets a lot of things wrong. However, they have an awesome police data portal. This portal is accessible to everyone for free and covers recruitment data.
The chart above is for overall numbers.
The chart below is for SBPD recruiting based on ethnicity.
Nearly 65% of Black candidates passed the written test.
Nearly 85% of White candidates passed the written test.
This appears to be the source of the Biden/Harris administration’s ire.
77% of Black candidates passed the physical test.
White candidates passed with an 87% rate.
Black and White candidates were nearly equal in the percentage who made it past the background check to the polygraph, medical, and psych evaluations to be hired.
This simplified chart only compares Black, White, and all candidates:
The Biden/Harris DOJ also alleges the physical test is sexist against women. Below is a chart for SBPD recruiting based on gender:
Just under 54% of women candidates passed the physical test.
Just over 87% of men passed the physical test.
This is at the heart of the DOJ’s allegations.
Nearly 88% of women passed the written test.
Just under 80% of men passed the written test.
Notice the DOJ isn’t concerned with women outperforming men on the written requirement.
Women also performed better than men on the personal evaluation and the background check. All were ignored by the DOJ in this issue.
Men and women were also nearly equal in the percentage who made it past the background check to the polygraph, medical, and psych evaluations to be hired.
Various sources of data on these statistics fluctuate a couple of percentage points here and there. I used data mainly from the National Policing Institute. That’s why you will see some of my numbers differ slightly from the numbers released by South Bend.
Looking at the data, you can see that as long as a candidate can get past the required examinations, they stand roughly and equal chance of getting hired regardless of race or gender.
Furthermore, since 2017, the South Bend Police Department has hired more Black officers and Women officers than is the national average. Their total force is getting closer to national averages as a whole. This is line with my interview with SBPD Chief Scott Ruszkowski in August of 2017 where he highlighted the efforts to diversify the department after former mayor Pete Buttigieg became a national story and had an embarrassing campaign setback due to his stance on policing. Chief Ruszkowski assured my in 2017 that they were making efforts to diversify the department but that they weren’t going to jeopardize the department’s quality in doing so. Candidates needed to meet the requirements and standards.
The SBPD doesn’t even administer the tests the DOJ is suing them over. They are administered by a third party who works with over 100 agencies in multiple states.
The department has been using the same written test since 2012, and the physical testing is mandated by the state of Indiana, according to department sources. This has never been brought up before now.
In January 2021, Joe Biden chose Kristen Clarke to head the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. Suddenly, the SBPD is in the crosshairs.
Clarke has a history of race-obsessed left-wing activism and election denying. She has previously claimed that Blacks had “superior physical and mental abilities” to others. She also invited an antisemitic conspiracy theorist to be a guest speaker on campus at Harvard.
Clarke’s disturbing history of bigotry and left-wing zealotry is concerning enough. However, it’s her history of supporting the radical ‘defund the police’ movement that is most concerning.
Given Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s ties with the city of South Bend, his tattered relationship with the SBPD, and Kristen Clarke’s radicalism, one has to wonder if this might be personal against the SBPD. One also has to consider that the DOJ is advancing the ‘defund the police’ agenda with this lawsuit.
CHEAT SHEET
Key Takeaways from the Blog Post on South Bend Police Recruiting Data
DOJ Lawsuit Against South Bend Police Department (SBPD)
The DOJ has sued SBPD and the City of South Bend, alleging discrimination in hiring practices under Title VII.
The lawsuit claims that the physical and written tests used by SBPD disproportionately impact female and Black applicants, despite SBPD arguing that these exams are essential to police duties.
SBPD’s Defense and Response
The City of South Bend asserts that the tests comply with Indiana state law and are aligned with the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy’s standards.
SBPD emphasizes that applicants have multiple attempts to pass the physical exam during a hiring cycle and access to free tutoring sessions for the written test.
The department argues that the lawsuit ignores SBPD’s efforts to build a diverse police force and meet community expectations.
Recruitment Data Analysis
Black candidates have a pass rate of 77% on the physical test, compared to 87% for White candidates.
The physical exam pass rate for women is lower at 54%, compared to 87% for men, which forms the core of the DOJ’s discrimination claim.
Women perform better than men on the written test (88% vs. 80%) and background evaluations, but the DOJ does not highlight these results in its lawsuit.
SBPD maintains that candidates who clear the required tests stand equal chances of hiring regardless of gender or race.
Efforts Toward Diversity
From 2017-2023, SBPD hired 15 female officers (12.6%) and 29 officers of color (24.4%), bringing it closer to national averages for diversity in police departments.
SBPD Chief Scott Ruszkowski has reiterated efforts to diversify without compromising hiring standards.
Political and Personal Factors in the Lawsuit
The blog suggests that the lawsuit may be influenced by political motives given South Bend’s connection to Pete Buttigieg, and the involvement of Kristen Clarke, head of the DOJ Civil Rights Division, who has a controversial history with race-related activism and police reform advocacy.
Third-Party Test Administration
SBPD clarifies that the tests are administered by a third-party organization used by multiple agencies across states and have been in place since 2012 without previous legal challenges.
Impact on City Resources
South Bend officials criticize the lawsuit as a waste of taxpayer resources and emphasize their commitment to following both state and federal law.
This summary highlights how the city believes its hiring practices are fair and compliant with legal standards while portraying the DOJ’s lawsuit as politically motivated and harmful to local hiring efforts.
The U.S. government has filed a ridiculous lawsuit against South Bend, IN, alleging discriminatory hiring practices in the city’s police department. The complaint claims the use of written and physical fitness tests disproportionately excluded African-American and female applicants.
The Department of Justice argues that these tests were not job-related or necessary for business purposes, violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I guess police officers can’t be required to pass a basic cognitive and physical test. The lawsuit seeks to reform the hiring process and ensure ‘equitable’ hiring policies moving forward. What a load of crap.
The lawsuit appears to be ludicrous on its face at this point. I’ve interviewed Chief Scott Ruszkowski on my show about the efforts to recruit more minority police officers after the Pete Buttigieg scandals. They were specifically reaching out to the very candidates that the federal government is now suing them over.
For full details, you can review the official document here.
Casey Hendrickson Show Recap: DeSantis Slams Harris, Trump Gains Working-Class Support, FEMA Funds Under Scrutiny
Hour 1 Recap:
A Springfield resident captured a shocking moment involving a Haitian migrant in a “pet-friendly” apartment complex. The incident was featured on CNN, raising questions about the situation. Governor Ron DeSantis also made headlines for his sharp critique of Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of lying about a phone call with Milton. DeSantis slammed Harris, stating she has “never contributed anything.” President Biden’s team appeared to distance themselves from the controversy, as Harris was caught lying about the DeSantis call, with many seeing Biden’s reaction as a move to throw her under the bus.
Pastor Lucas Miles led this week’s Tuesday Tithe, a faith-based segment that resonates with many. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump continues to dominate the headlines. His support among union and working-class voters has surged, marking the highest approval for a Republican candidate in four decades. The Teamsters Union President added fuel to the fire, candidly telling comedian Theo Von that Democrats have “f**ked us over” for the last 40 years.
Hour 2 Recap:
In business news, McDonald’s is suing Tyson Foods for allegedly manipulating the beef supply chain to raise prices. The lawsuit comes as supply chain issues continue to affect various industries. In a bombshell report, Doug Emhoff, the Second Gentleman, faces claims of misogynistic behavior during his time at a Los Angeles law firm. Former staff accuse Emhoff of hiring a “trophy secretary” and retaliating against women who didn’t engage with his flirtatious behavior.
In disaster relief news, FEMA’s funding has become a hot topic. While Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas claimed that the agency has no more disaster funds, an IG report contradicted this, revealing that FEMA is sitting on billions of dollars. Following these claims, FEMA’s head clarified that the agency has cash for near-term aid, despite the ongoing debate about its financial health. Meanwhile, an unusual government decision sent electric chainsaws to an Appalachian town still struggling without power.
Hour 3 Recap:
In political news, Pennsylvania scheduled an update to its voter-registration website on the same day as former President Trump’s Butler rally, raising eyebrows among his supporters. In media coverage, CBS claimed that Trump backed out of an interview with 60 Minutes, but his campaign stated that he never agreed to the interview in the first place. Trump later revealed the terms he would accept for appearing on 60 Minutes, challenging the network’s credibility. Meanwhile, Vice President Harris faced another embarrassment as CBS reportedly edited out her fumbling “word salad” response during her interview, further feeding criticism of her performance.
Stay tuned for further developments on these stories and more updates on the latest political drama!
Keywords: Kamala Harris, Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, working-class voters, Teamsters Union, FEMA funding, McDonald’s, Tyson Foods, Doug Emhoff