Reporter Who Was Harassed By Antifa Fired For Covering Protests Accurately

Jonathan Choe, was a reporter for KOMO News in Seattle, WA.

He wrote an article on Medium that he was fired for how he covered a Proud Boys rally. The Proud Boys are a group that has been falsely labeled as a white supremacist hate group by alt-left extremist organizations in spite of The Proud Boys clearly rejecting racism in their charter and allowing all races to join their ranks while being led by a man who is not white.

I interviewed a Black Proud Boys member a while back after the group was falsely blamed for violence in Kalamazoo, MI (in my listening audience) by local authorities and politicians. Those same authorities were forced to admit The Proud Boys were the victims in Kalamazoo.

Yahoo News:

Choe was covering the rally in the Washington state capital of Olympia earlier this month. He tweeted a photo montage of the Proud Boys rally, including some controversial music in the clip. That drew outrage from the Twitterati, who allegedly accused him of being a “white supremacist.”

Choe is Asian. Then again, left-wing cultists now say Asians are White people.

Choe responded to the false allegation regarding the ‘controversial music:’

In a Tweet recapping the day, I decided to create a photo montage with natural sound from the march(in TV news this is what’s called a “NAT Pkg”). One of my videos picked up music blasting from a speaker strapped over the shoulder of one of the protesters. I could not make out the words and had never heard this song in my life. You could also hear car horns and the footsteps of marchers as I weaved in and out of the crowd. I laid some photos over this natural sound from the video and hit send.

I later learned the song is called “We’ll Have Our Home Again,” and is sometimes played at white nationalist rallies. This piece was never meant to air on KOMO News and it never did. I wanted it to be a conversation starter, and it sure did incite an unexpected response. In hindsight, I wish I added more context to this Tweet. But before I could clarify or respond to the criticism, my news director told me to take down all my social media related to the Proud Boys march. I was also told by my boss not to speak to any outside media. The following day, I was fired from KOMO.

I’d never heard the song before either. The version used during the rally appears to be Pine Tree Riots – We’ll Have Our Home Again.

The Pine Tree Riot was an act of resistance to British royal authority undertaken by American colonists in Weare, New Hampshire on April 14, 1772 – Wikipedia

Everything that has its roots in patriotism is labeled as ‘white nationalist’ by the alt-left blue anon conspiracy theorists.

There’s nothing in the lyrics to suggest the song is racist in any way without severe mental gymnastics. Whether or not it’s played at ‘white nationalist’ rallies is irrelevant. I’m still waiting for someone to define what a ‘white nationalist’ actually is. They keep freezing up when I ask that question.

Allowing any group to coopt anything to become their own is a sign of societal weakness. Just because a small group uses a symbol that is commonplace, doesn’t mean that symbol now exclusively represents that small group. To say otherwise is silly.

Choe was fired by KOMO because he didn’t lie about The Proud Boys and their rally. It was peaceful and he reported it as such. For that, he was fired.

You’ve heard me mention Jonathon Choe on my show before. He was harassed by antifa for covering the homeless crisis in Seattle.

Andy Ngo, another Asian journalist harassed and attacked by antifa, posted a montage of the vile attacks on Jonathan Choe by antifa:

The word has gone out … if you are an honest journalist and tell the truth without falling in line, you will be removed.

 

 

 

Tuesday, January 12 – Hour 2

Hour 2
Idaho Internet Provider Blocks Facebook, Twitter
Newly sworn in Indiana attorney general takes a stand on free speech, says he’ll investigate tech censorship
Michigan Capitol Commission bans open carry of guns inside state Capitol
AG Dana Nessel: Michigan Capitol remains unsafe, despite ban on open carry of guns
Amazon Partner GoDaddy Allegedly Kicks Pro-Gun Site Off Servers
ABC, CBS Reporters Delete Hot Tweets — One on ‘Cleansing’ and One on DeVos Quitting
WaPo’s Robinson: Trump Supporters ‘Need to Be Deprogrammed’

Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/caseythehost/message
Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/caseythehost/support

Iowa Caucus App That Caused Turmoil Run By Same Group Planning To Publish FAKE Newspapers To Elect Democrats

Iowa Caucus App That Caused Turmoil Run By Same Group Planning To Publish FAKE Newspapers To Elect Democrats

The fiasco in the Democratic Iowa caucuses have been directly tied to the app that allegedly crashed. That app is run by a group called Shadow Inc.

This is Shadow’s mission statement:

Our mission is to build political power for the progressive movement
 by developing affordable and easy-to-use tools for teams and budgets of any size.

Pete Buttigieg and Joe Biden have been accused of using Shadow to try and steal the Iowa caucuses from Bernie Sanders. I don’t know if that’s true but they have a legitimate beef. Get ready to go down the rabbit hole.

In 2019, a liberal group called ACRONYM acquired Shadow Inc. ACRONYM is a Democrat dark money machine that was founded by Tara McGowan. She has a long resume as a Democrat operative. Her husband advises Pete Buttigieg’s campaign and she is a big fan of Pete.

Buttigieg has been given the moniker of Mayor Cheat by Bernie supporters for claiming victory in Iowa in spite of the results not being released yet. Also, his internal results have him losing to Bernie.

https://twitter.com/BrentWelder/status/1224666278268370945

https://twitter.com/PeopleforTulsi/status/1224660168518094849

https://twitter.com/jackallisonLOL/status/1224580444399656960

Pete’s campaign gave Shadow Inc. money. Not unusual but given how things are playing out in Iowa, this is giving Bernie supporters fits. It certainly doesn’t look good.

ABC 57:

The results of the caucuses are not expected to be released until Tuesday afternoon due to inconsistencies in reporting.

Shadow Inc. describes its mission on its website as: “Our mission is to build political power for the progressive movement
 by developing affordable and easy-to-use tools for teams and budgets of any size.”

A check of the Federal Election Commission website shows Buttigieg isn’t the only candidate to use their services.

  • Nevada State Democratic Party    $58,000
  • Pete for America     $42,500
  • Gillibrand 2020    $37,400
  • For Our Future    $10,643.25
  • Democratic Party of Wisconsin    $3,750
  • Biden for President    $1,225
  • Texas Democratic Party    $250

Buttigieg’s campaign told CNN they paid Shadow Inc for text messaging.

So an app by former Hillary campaign alums got money from Biden and Buttigieg, and Bernie’s Iowa win is being caught up in a disaster of results reporting. I wonder why Bernie supporters might be a bit conspiratorial here?

It gets better. Tara McGowan and ACRONYM are the people behind the plan to create fake newspapers in swing states to trick voters into voting for Democrats. Literally, they are creating fake news to get Democrats elected. This tactic was also used in the UK.

  • A new Democrat dark money operation acquires a company that makes tools for campaigns.
  • The founder of said operation loves Pete and her husband advises him.
  • Dems have been working to assist Biden.
  • Last Des Moines Register poll showed Biden losing Iowa big.
  • Poll magically doesn’t get published.
  • App to tally results crashes.
  • Biden and Buttigieg gave money to the app creators.
  • Pete declares victory without any results published. He also loses to Bernie with his own internal data.
  • Internal data shows last unpublished poll was most accurate on Biden’s results.
  • All of this is tied to well-known Democrat dark money machine strategizing to fabricate fake news, masquerade it as real, and get Democrats elected.

Hard to blame Bernie supporters for thinking something is amiss.

 

Exactly What Would Justify War To The Pacifist Hordes

Exactly What Would Justify War To The Pacifist Hordes

I’ve often asked this question in my writings and on my show. Most often, in discussions with the ignorant about Saddam being the innocent victim of Bush/Cheney aggression.

No clear answer has been given by pacifists to the question: “What would justify war?”

The pacifist hordes often give conflicting answers.  For example, Ron Paul (who claims a form of pacifism) was interviewed by John Stossel in 2007, and was asked what would justify a war.

If you’re attacked, you have a right and an obligation to defend (your) country. I do not believe there is ever a moral justification to start the war.

That sounds nice, but I found Paul’s answer interesting, and vague.  What constitutes an attack?  Is it on your property, your citizens, or must it be within your national borders?  Pacifists have been unable to clarify this position for me over the years.

What does this have to do with Iraq, and my greater point later?

Before the 2003 Iraq invasion, Saddam was repeatedly ‘attacking’ the US and her allies in a little discussed conflict in the no fly zones.  Yet Ron Paul, and others, have frequently said that there was no justification for the invasion of Iraq.  So … shooting/attacking US citizens, and destroying US property is not an attack?

I’m of a different viewpoint, and my training to invade Iraq under Clinton proved that even Slick Willy agreed with me.

So why bring this up now?  Iraq was a resounding success, and Saddam is dead.  Because we may be heading for another war.

Tensions have been rising with Pakistan for years.  The killing of Osama bin Laden only catapulted those tensions to the mainstream.  During the aftermath of that operation, we clearly learned that Pakistan is no friend of the US. Yet, something far worse was kept from us.

NY Times:

A group of American military officers and Afghan officials had just finished a five-hour meeting with their Pakistani hosts in a village schoolhouse settling a border dispute when they were ambushed — by the Pakistanis.

Yep.  Ambushed by the Pakistanis … ahem … allegedly.

Maj. Larry J. Bauguess lost his life in the attack.

This blatant act of war was covered up by both the Pakistanis and Washington.  In fact, Pakistan has been well-known to retaliate for collateral damage by US forces with open attacks on US personnel.

Some will blame America for the incident, and say that Pakistan was just retaliating for their losses.  An interesting point, albeit one that ignores Pakistan’s hindering our intelligence, and often openly helping the enemy against us.

Then there’s Iran.  We know they are sending weapons across the border into Iraq to help kill Americans.  There have even been clashes with US and Iranian military forces.  Something that was also kept quiet, and has happened more than once.

Right about now someone will say that none of this would happen if we weren’t there to begin with, so we are still the aggressor.  That’s about as intelligent as inviting someone over for dinner, and then calling them a burglar.

Am I calling for war with Pakistan or Iran?  No.

Were those two incidents justification for war in my opinion?  Yes.

I’m saddened that neither party has an option for president that touts legit military credentials.  We have, after all, been at war for a decade with no truly experienced military veteran in the White House.  Going forward, we may not have an option for peace either.  It makes me wonder … how different things would be if a competent military commander were also sitting in the White House.