reinstates key parts of executive order Published June 26, 2017 Fox News NOW PLAYING Supreme Court lifts injunction on travel ban In a victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Monday lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump’s proposed ban on travel from six majority-Muslim nations, reinstating much of the policy and promising to hear full arguments as early as this fall.
Blair Gladwin, owner of the California based Gladwin Guns and Ammo, filed three class action lawsuits last week against online payment processors PayPal, Stripe, and Square for singling out him and other firearms businesses.
Listen to ACLUattorneyOmar Jadwat argue before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that Trump‘s travel moratorium is unconstitutional, thus illegal. However, he was asked by Judge Paul Niemeyer if another candidate besides Trump had won the election, and issued the same exact order, would it be constitutional then? The obvious inference from Judge Niemeyer is that if Hillary Clinton had issued the same travel moratorium then Jadwat wouldn’t have any problem with it.
Jadwat confirmed that if anyone but Trump had issued the order, it would be constitutional, and legal.
Amazing.
“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”
“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.
It’s ok to disagree with something President Trump does. It’s not ok to lie and say it is illegal, or unconstitutional. Which is exactly what activist judges, and radical leftists are doing when it comes to President Trump’s executive order issuing a temporary travel moratorium for people from one of seven countries.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]It’s ok to disagree with something Pres. Trump does. It’s not ok to lie & say it is illegal, or unconstitutional. [/Tweet]
In this podcast, Casey breaks down the full legal authority President Trump has to issue this executive order, and why the courts (so far) and his critics are factually incorrect in saying his order is illegal or unconstitutional.
Trump’s authority is codified in US law in (8 U.S.C. §1182(f)).
