Monday, 1 – 3

Hour 3

The Folly of Lockdowns Exposed in One Simple Graph
Pfizer CEO: ‘Every Year You Will Have to Get Your Annual Shot for COVID’
New York Times Blasted for Citing ‘Unpublished Research’ Inciting Fear About New COVID Variant
A Modest Proposal For Republicans: Use The Word “Class.”

After years of me using ‘political class vs us’ … people are starting to get it.

Virginia School System Bans Dr. Seuss Books from Read Across America Program over ‘Strong Racial Undertones’

Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/caseythehost/message
Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/caseythehost/support

White Punks Used Slurs While Attacking Marines

Antifa is they claim to oppose. They are violent, fascist bigots.

Both testified that Keenan, Massey, and approximately ten other people — and women, some masked and some unmasked — then began attacking them with mace, punches, and kicks, and calling them “nazis” and “white supremacists.”

On stand, Godinez said that he was “bewildered” by called a white supremacist and immediately cried out, “I’m Mexican!” After that, as the attack continued, both men said that members of the group, including Keenan, repeatedly used ethnic slurs, including “spic” and “wetback,” the marines. (There was no testimony that Massey used any such language).

Source: Marines describe violence, racial slurs used by Antifa mob in Philadelphia

Of course, media coverage of this is scant at best. John Sexton nails this point.

Why ‘t this story big ? far as I can tell, hasn’t devoted a single word to this story about actual violence by Antifa members since it happened nearly a month ago. I guess Don Lemon and Brooke Baldwin were too busy with other things. Domestic political violence was all-the-rage last month, now it’s just old hat.

To be clear, I don’t blame CNN for violence by Antifa goons, but I do think CNN’s hosts ought to be accountable for defending those goons long after it should have been clear they were violent bullies.

 

Bob Costas, Pasty Guy Offended By Word Native ‘t Offended By

, a PC libtard, reared his ugly smugness again on Sunday.  He decided to everyone who isn’t offended by the ‘ on why they are wrong … including Native Americans.

After starting telling everyone that the vast majority of Native Americans aren’t offended by the name ‘Redskins’ (and they aren’t), he went on to say that their doesn’t matter, and that ‘Redskins’ is actually highly .  Apparently, Costas thinks Native Americans are so dumb and naive that they need him to protect their fragile psyche.  So he’s stepping up to be offended for them.

The only survey done on the subject that specifically asked Native Americans how they felt showed 90% didn’t think the name ‘Redskins’ was offensive.  As I illustrated recently, everyone except Native Americans are offended by this name.  Most notably, pasty do-gooders like Costas.

I’ve also pointed out that in my many discussions on this topic, Native Americans believe that people like Costas are attempting to erase Native Americans from our culture, and they think it’s motivated by racial discrimination.

It’s hard to argue against the claim that people like Costas are against Native Americans when he goes on national television and tells them that they are wrong for not offended by something that only they have the authority to decide is .

Black (not so ) comedian W. Kamau Bell recently said that white people ‘can’t say what’s racist or not’ when it comes to being offended.  Ok, if that’s the case, then whites, blacks, asians, etc. say what’s racist or not when it comes to Native Americans. So … shut up about it.

Costas’ logic to support his was to make the point that if we go back in time (that would be the 1600’s btw), ‘Redskin’ was a derogatory term used to describe Native Americans.

So what?

Hoosier was a derogatory term used to describe people from Indiana, and now we wear that moniker with pride.  Retard and retarded are perfectly legitimate mechanical terms that society foolishly decided was offensive only recently.  Can we go back to just 10 years ago and reclaim retard’s legitimate definition like Costas is suggesting with Redskin?

How about if we reclaim the definition of faggot and fag while we are at it.  It originally had nothing to do with homosexuals, and isn’t used primarily to disparage them now anyway.  Yet we can’t call someone a fag without being accused of being a homophobe.  Even though the word is rarely used to describe homosexuals.

South Park explained all of this perfectly:

 

 

The professionally offended are destroying our society, culture, and language while stoking bigotry where none exist. It’s time to hold their feet to the fire.

 

UPDATE:

Mofo Politics has a petition to demand Costas change his offensive name.