by Casey | May 21, 2020 | Blog, Conspiracy, Science
A few weeks ago, I told you about Professor Petr Chumakov, a leading Russian microbiologist at Russia’s Federal Research Centre for Research and Development of Immunobiological Preparations. He said the Chinese Wuhan lab was doing ‘absolutely crazy things’ in the laboratory.
He claimed they had been “actively involved in the development of various coronavirus variants for over ten years.
‘Moreover, they did this, supposedly not with the aim of creating pathogenic variants, but to study their pathogenicity.”
The ‘crazy things’ they did were:
‘For example, inserts in the genome, which gave the virus the ability to infect human cells.
‘Now all this has been analyzed.
‘The picture of the possible creation of the current coronavirus is slowly emerging.’
He told Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper: ‘There are several inserts, that is, substitutions of the natural sequence of the genome, which gave it special properties.
‘It is interesting that the Chinese and Americans who worked with them published all their works in the open (scientific) press.
Basically, he accused them of taking viruses that wouldn’t transfer to humans, altering them, and making the virus a threat to human beings.
This is critical because a new study from Austria says the exact same thing about COVID-19. They say it’s been manipulated in a lab. The general consensus now is that COVID-19 did, in fact, come from the Wuhan lab. The question has now been whether it was a natural virus that escaped, or was it manipulated by humans.
Summit News:
A scientific study in Austria has found that SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that has led to a pandemic, was likely created in a lab, barring some “remarkable coincidence” that led to the virus naturally evolving to be optimised to attack human cells.
The study was led by Nikolai Petrovsky, a vaccine researcher at Flinders University. The scientists in his team discovered that the coronavirus is optimized for penetration into human cells, rather than animal cells, which means that the theory that it emerged from an animal market and jumped to humans naturally is unlikely.
Lifesite News reports that the scientists “used a version of the novel coronavirus collected in the earliest days of the outbreak and applied computer models to test its capacity to bind to certain cell receptor enzymes, called “ACE2,” that allow the virus to infect human and animal cells to varying degrees of efficacy.”
“They found that “the novel coronavirus most powerfully binds with human ACE2, and with variously lesser degrees of effectiveness with animal versions of the receptor.”
The authors believe this means that the virus “became specialized for human cell penetration by living previously in human cells, quite possibly in a laboratory.”
Pretty remarkable if the study holds up.
by Casey | Nov 13, 2019 | Blog, Fake News, Media Bias, Science
The Environmental Protection Agency suggested Tuesday that a New York Times’ report fleshing out the agency’s move to make the regulatory process more transparent contained gross inaccuracies.
The EPA took exception to several sections of a NYT report Monday that highlights the agency’s proposal to help make data collecting more transparent for scientists who are trying to replicate research. The report contained “glaring inaccuracies,” the agency noted in a statement.
EPA’s statement starts with an explanation of how the so-called Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science rule will impact the agency’s ability to craft regulations. The proposal seeks to make the data and scientific studies that are pivotal to regulatory action available for review.
On Nov. 8, the EPA delivered to the Office of Management and Budget a draft supplemental federal register notice (FRN) to clarify vague elements of the original 2018 proposal, according to the agency’s statement. The agency intends on filing a final rule in 2020.
NYT’s report Monday “incorrectly” noted that the proposal “could apply retroactively to public health regulations already in place.” Neither the proposal nor the supplemental apply to regulations already in place, the EPA noted before lambasting other elements of the report.
The report suggests that the EPA’s proposal might render existing regulations inadmissible when they come up for renewal. TheNYT suggested a 1993 Harvard University project linking polluted air to premature deaths could be nixed under the proposal. Scientists in the project collected data from people who signed confidentiality agreements ahead of the project.
This characterization is false, according to the EPA. (RELATED: Andrew Wheeler Says He Will Implement Rule To Keep ‘Secret Science’ Out Of EPA)
Click here to view original web page at dailycaller.com
by Casey | Aug 29, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy, Fake News, Idiocracy, Media Bias, Science
Part 1 and 2 from my live stream on August 27, 2019.
Not only are celebrities, activists, and politicians sharing photos that aren’t the Amazon fires, but there hasn’t been an increase in Amazon fires this year. Certainly not an 80+ percent increase. The fires are on average for the past 15 years. Also, most of the fires are on already cleared agricultural land, not in virgin rainforest. This type of burning is commonplace every few years with farmers.
Oh, and the Amazon isn’t the ‘lungs of the Earth’ and it doesn’t produce 20% of our oxygen. That’s fake news.
by Casey | Aug 6, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy, Idiocracy, Science
President Donald Trump implied his support Monday for increased regulation of video games and monitoring of the Internet, which he suggested were catalysts for mass shootings.
Trump did not address potential gun control legislation in his 10-minute speech, though he said earlier on Twitter that he is looking at strengthening background checks for gun purchases.
“We must stop the glorification of violence in our society,” Trump said in his prepared remarks at the White House.
“This includes the gruesome and grizzly video games that are now commonplace. It is too easy today for troubled youth to surround themselves with a culture that celebrates violence. We must stop or substantially reduce this, and it has to begin immediately.” (RELATED: Federal Prosecutors Are Treating El Paso Shooting As Domestic Terrorism, Possible Hate Crime)
Despite Trump’s calls for regulation of video games, research on a potential link to violence is mixed. A 2015 study in the American Psychological Association found insufficient evidence that video games lead to violence. The Atlantic noted over the weekend that numerous other studies have failed to prove a causal link between video games and shootings.
Click here to view original web page at dailycaller.com
Well, the research actually isn’t mixed. It’s pretty clear that violent video games don’t lead to violence.
Read THIS POST for links to tons of research proving violent video games don’t cause violence.
This study actually shows they are good for you.
by Casey | Apr 24, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy, Idiocracy, Podcast, Science
Earth Day is a lie.
When Earth Day was founded, they made a bunch of dire climate predictions that were promoted as the ‘consensus’ of climate scientists. Sound familiar? None of these predictions came true. They were complete nonsense.
Every year, Casey goes over a short list of these failed predictions to remind everyone that the so-called ‘consensus’ on climate issues has routinely been a lie and their fear-mongering predictions have all not come to pass.
