I played a few minutes of this video on the air yesterday. It’s well done, and right on point.
History is full of #unpopular speech that rebuffed the ‘consensus’ or ‘conventional wisdom’ or ‘common sense’ that all ended up being wrong. There are active, and even institutionalized, efforts to censor speech that goes against current ‘conventional wisdom.’ We must not allow those efforts to succeed.
Make no mistake … what you’re about to see is #child abuse.
This is celebrated child abuse. #UNILAD and their lackies praise this young boy’s torment.
UNILAD posted this video to their Facebook page with the caption:
This little man’s passion for environmental issues is inspiring! 🙌 đź‘Ź
Just another day for UNILAD. The internet’s most notorious plagiarizers, liars, and content thieves. Might as well add ‘child abuse enthusiasts’ to the list of their faults.
There’s nothing different from this radicalization of children than what terrorists do in radicalizing Palestinian children in Hamas schools. These children are incapable of understanding what they are being told, and what they are being told is almost always a lie.
I’ve told the stories of how PETA was allowed to come into my school and brainwash students with their false propaganda many times on my show. I always challenged them, and beat them. I used science, biology, and facts. They use emotion, mythology, and hyperbole. Eventually I was disinvited to this required regular assembly so they could brainwash everyone else without a counter argument. That’s how the greenies like it. They can’t win on facts, so they ban all opposition. Just as Oregon just did.
The Portland Public Schools board unanimously approved a resolution this week that bans textbooks and other teaching materials that deny #climate change exists or cast doubt on whether humans are to blame.
The resolution, introduced by school board member Mike Rosen, also directs the superintendent and staff to develop a plan for offering “curriculum and educational opportunities that address climate change and climate justice” in all Portland public schools, the Portland Tribune reported.
It’s just another layer in the 97% consensus lie. They don’t have the science, they don’t have the satellite data, and literally every prediction they’ve ever made has been inaccurate. The next step is to silence the opposition, fabricate ‘consensus’ and brainwash our children into taking up a mythological crusade.
This isn’t anything new really.
When the fauxmentary ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ came out, schools across the world required kids to watch it. This is in spite of the fact that Al Gore admitted to fabricating the movie’s conclusions out of thin air. A counter movie to ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ was called ‘The Great #Global Warming Swindle’ and they attempted to have their film shown with Gore’s to present both sides. This wasn’t allowed.
Soon after the full-court press to brainwash our kids started, they started having nightmares.
As I’ve illustrated on my show countless times … if you create an environment of fear, you can manipulate people to your cause more easily. They think they are protecting their loved ones, and themselves. Fear makes people less likely to use reason. As does anger.
This is brainwashing 101.
We all know how modern, dependent upon further funding in perpetuity so we have jobs, ‘#science‘ goes. One week a #study will be released showing one result, and the next week another study showing the opposite result gets published. It’s been that way for years. Coffee is healthy, coffee is unhealthy. Eggs are healthy, eggs are unhealthy. It’s become so predictable that I routinely mock ‘studies’ like this on the program.
#Cell phones are one of those study subjects that I mock on a regular basis. For years, ‘scientists’ have been saying that cell phones cause various forms of cancers, infertility, and even psychological disorders. The following week, a counter-study will release the exact opposite results. That’s what happened this week again with cell phones, and the risk of you getting #cancer.
A study of 30 years’ worth of data has concluded that no link exists between mobile phones and brain cancers.
The study, out of Australia, pores over the prevalence of brain tumors since 1987, reports the Daily Mail.
During this 29-year period — a time when mobile phone usage has increased dramatically — there was no corresponding increase in cancerous brain tumors.
Going through 30 years worth of data seems like a good baseline to start drawing conclusions, don’t you think?
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]Going through 30 years worth of data seems like a good baseline to start drawing conclusions, don’t you think? http://snip.ly/ewt5b [/Tweet]
That study was released the first week of May.
It’s the news everyone has been dreading: That little cell phone that people use all the time could cause cancer.
However, before you throw your phone across the room, the authors of the study have not said how the study’s findings on #rats can compare to effects on humans.
The National Toxicology Program study exposed rats to radiation emitted from our cell phones for two and a half years.
The rats exposed to the radiation developed more tumors in the brain and heart that could be linked to cancer than the control group, which was not exposed.
This study was released this week. About 20 days after the first study. The headlines on this study all state that the government says cell phones may or will cause cancer. They use the word ‘government’ to give the results heft and legitimacy. When, in fact, the opposite should be true. US government studies are often the most biased, least scientific studies that get published. They are frequently used as vehicles for new legislation. That legislation almost always is designed to elicit new tax revenue of some sort.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]They use the word ‘government’ to give the results heft and legitimacy. When, in fact, the opposite should be true. http://snip.ly/ewt5b [/Tweet]
The US government’s questionable ‘scientific’ studies are too numerous to count. They fund thousands of labs and researchers across the country. All wholly dependent upon federal funding to keep themselves from shutting down. Some of the most egregious examples of #pseudoscience from government #research is the false demonization of second-hand smoke, and now the false demonization of e-cigarettes and vaping.
So which of these studies should you believe is more accurate?
One uses 29Â years worth of data, and finds no increase in cancer tumors though cell phone use has obviously spiked in human beings. The other exposed rats to cell phones, only the males developed cancer, and the researchers themselves admit they can’t draw a conclusion to these results with human beings. So who do you believe has the better conclusion?
No let’s look at the way the propaganda machine works in the American media industrial complex … better known as the MSM (main stream media).
Remember, these two studies were released in the same month, only weeks apart. So let’s do a Google search for ‘cell phones cancer’ and filter the results to only include the last month.
Page 1 of Google results. Notice anything?
On the first page of Google, only one link seems to challenge the narrative that a government study had shown a link between cell phones and cancer … a Twitter user.
Took me seconds to check SEER data. Cell phones ain't rare. Here's brain cancer incidence.https://t.co/dHgIBZ260D pic.twitter.com/KKbJgM0vQp
— Aaron E. Carroll (@aaronecarroll) May 27, 2016
In a sea of journalists, news outlets and agencies, an individual on Twitter is the only person pointing out the great flaw of this ‘study.’
Aaron is a fairly known health researcher who likely only made the front page of Google because he has over 22k Twitter followers. He’s the one beacon of hope on page 1.
That's not what the study says. But kudos on the scary headline! https://t.co/dHgIBZ260D https://t.co/SLJOp2PJFi
— Aaron E. Carroll (@aaronecarroll) May 27, 2016
Let’s see page 2 of Google’s results:
Page 2 of the results gives us three links highlighting the far larger, more legitimate study saying there’s no link between cell phones and cancer. Of those three, none are major media outlets, and one attempts to discredit the study in its title when it says “experts not sure.”
Furthermore, we learn that the study linking cell phones to cancer … in rats … well, only male rats … cost taxpayers $25 million! For $25 million we got a study where the researchers put cell phones next to rats, and the researchers literally said they cannot say how their findings would compare to effects on humans. Why are we funding this exactly?
At this point, I’d like to pause to remind you the National Toxicology Program is a program within the Health and Human Services department. As is the National Institutes of Health. The same people who spend tens of millions of dollars in largely silly research endeavors like if birds slur when they chirp after drinking alcohol. The same people who want $2 billion in new funds to fight the zika virus.
But wait … there’s more!
No research is worth anything unless it’s peer reviewed, and its results upheld.
Peer reviewer Dr. Michael S. Lauer doubted the findings, saying he was skeptical of the study’s claims.
“I suspect that this experiment is substantially underpowered and that the few positive results found reflect false positive findings,” he wrote.
Lauer had a particular issue with the fact that male rats in the control group, and therefore not exposed to the cell phone radiation, had a low survival rate. Only 28 percent survived the length of the study, and the average survival rate of rats in National Toxicology Program studies is 47 percent.
Researchers said they did not know how to explain that low rate.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/nation-world/national/article80271547.html##storylink=cpy
Um … what?
Not only are the ‘study’s’ peer reviewers calling the results into question, there seems to be an unexplained issue with the survival rates of the rats involved in the research.
So, essentially, we paid $25 million (so far) to study a potential link to cell phones and cancer, we found no link, there’s massive problems with the study’s methodology and subjects, the researchers admit they can’t draw comparisons with their results and humans, but the media is peddling a false-narrative that a link has been found. Yep, another day in the pseudoscience industrial complex that is US government ‘research.’
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]Yep, another day in the pseudoscience industrial complex that is US government ‘research.’ Via @CaseyTheHost http://snip.ly/ewt5b [/Tweet]
FYI, page 3 of the Google results yielded recognizable names in media reporting on the results of the 29 year study showing no link between cell phones and cancer, but none of these sources (while popular, and recognized) are what we’d call major media outlets. It wasn’t until page 6 of the results that a major media outlet’s reporting of the 29 study was presented. Research shows that 91% of internet searchers do not go past the first page of search results. Even though the study showing a link between cell phones and cancer is essentially garbage, 91% of people searching for information on the subject will assume a positive link had been made between the two simply because of the search results.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]Research shows that 91% of internet searchers do not go past the first page of search results. Via @CaseyTheHost http://snip.ly/ewt5b[/Tweet]
I rightfully, and masterfully, ridiculed #Katie Couric and her new #anti-gun ‘#documentary‘ a while ago on the show. She appeared on ‘The Late Show with Steven Colbert’ to peddle her new fiction movie called ‘#Under The Gun.’ From the clips she showed it was clear this movie was going to be an exercise in #selective editing, and leading questions.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]It was clear this movie was going to be an exercise in selective editing. http://snip.ly/b3yod @CaseyTheHost[/Tweet]
I also mocked her for stating that ‘the NRA only represents 5% of gun owners.’ No Katie, the #NRA represents 100% of gun owners. Only 5% are paying members.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]No Katie Couric, the NRA represents 100% of gun owners. Only 5% are paying members. http://snip.ly/b3yod Via @CaseyTheHost[/Tweet]
Plus, we already know her claim that 90% want #universal background checks is a #debunked #myth. When you ask the question in a specific way about private transfers, 53% of Americans disagree with having background checks of this nature.
Here we are a few weeks later, and we have already acquired the proof that Katie Couric’s ‘Under the Gun’ is about as accurate as the NY Times’ discredited hit piece on Trump.
Oops!
Of course, anyone who watches that scene absent the raw/true audio will know it is heavily edited. Confirmation bias, however, will make anti-Constitution advocate WANT to believe it wasn’t edited to push a false narrative.
The group Katie Couric LIES about in this scene are not happy campers.
The Virginia Citizens Defense League labeled the deceptively edited segment featured in the film “unbelievable and extremely unprofessional.” Philip Van Cleave, the organization’s president, said the editing was done deliberately to make it appear that league members didn’t have a response to Couric’s question.
“Katie Couric asked a key question during an #interview of some members of our organization,” he said. “She then intentionally removed their answers and spliced in nine seconds of some prior video of our members sitting quietly and not responding. Viewers are left with the misunderstanding that the members had no answer to her question.”
In all honesty, you guys should have known better. Maybe you did. Perhaps that’s why we have the raw audio.
There are many false claims in the movie that have been #exposed, but Katie Couric and the anti-Constitution lobby are all in using the Joseph Goebbels model of propaganda.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]Katie Couric and the anti-Constitution lobby are all in using the Joseph Goebbels model of propaganda. Via @CaseyTheHost http://snip.ly/b3yod[/Tweet]
Again, it was already indisputable that #Facebook censors #conservatives. Unless you give them tons of money on a regular basis like #Glenn Beck does.
Facebook announced Monday it was sending employees out for retraining and would discontinue some of its practices as it sought to defend itself against charges of political bias against conservatives.
The online giant denied that it’s shown “systematic political bias,” but admitted employees played a bigger role than previously acknowledged in determining what news is highlighted in the trending topics section.
Facebook also acknowledged that rogue employees may have unintentionally discriminated against conservative stories or even acted with malice in “isolated improper actions.”
In other words, there’s too much evidence we are guilty of censoring conservative voices to continue to deny it. So we will blame it on ‘rogue’ employees, and ‘unintentional’ #censorship.
Related articles
God forbid we should live in the historical bastion of free speech, and say something as innocent as ‘#build that wall.’ A phrase that, literally, means you want to prevent crime.
In pro-criminal sub-America, you will obey. You will submit. You will yield.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]In pro-criminal sub-America, you will obey. You will submit. http://snip.ly/0lv1h – Via @CaseyTheHost[/Tweet]
A #student responsible for hanging a “build a wall” #banner at an Oregon high school has apologized.
The student said he wanted to do something “provocative” to protest restrictions on #freedom of speech and didn’t realize until later that the phrase held such a strong, threatening connotation. The student says he doesn’t believe a barrier should be constructed on the border with Mexico and is truly sorry for hurting people.See full story on Oregon HS student apologizes for ‘build a wall’ banner | Fox News Latino
What in the actual *bleep*? Looks like he proved his point about restrictions on freedom of speech.
Like we don’t know this was coerced? He might as well have been sitting in the Hanoi Hilton (hey, Obama’s in Vietnam!) and making one of those ‘we are the evil bad guys‘ videos they used as propaganda. Propaganda Walter Cronkite was all too willing to play while Americans tried to eat dinner.
Good to know President Obama is right there threatening federal funds if schools don’t let penises in the girls locker room, but isn’t saying a damn thing about this blatant, and actual, civil rights violation.
[Tweet theme=”basic-full”]Obama threatens federal funds for trans bathrooms, but not actual civil rights violations. http://snip.ly/0lv1h – Via @CaseyTheHost[/Tweet]
#Apologize, and take it all back or you won’t be able to participate in any extracurricular activities or graduate, and we’ll make sure colleges know just how much of a pile of scum you really are.
