New York Times Reporter Reveals That James Comey Had a Spy In Loretta Lynch’s Office, and Knew That She Had Declared She Would Not Permit the Clinton Email Scandal to Go Very Far

Quoting from the New York Post.

Lynch had made major career advances in the 1990s under President Bill Clinton — and her boss, President Barack Obama, plainly supported Hillary’s candidacy. Plus, Obama was also implicated in the scandal, since he’d exchanged multiple emails with Clinton at her non-government address — a fact they were all keeping from the public.

Stewart reports that Comey’s “highly placed informant” indicated that Lynch wouldn’t let the FBI investigation add to Clinton’s woes. An email reportedly from the head of the Democratic National Committee assured a civilian that “Lynch wouldn’t let the Clinton investigation get very far, suggesting that Lynch would protect Clinton,” Stewart writes.

Can we load every single person who vouched for the incorruptibility of James Comey and the senior FBI into a trebuchet and catapult them into the sea? Why are these people still permitted to comment? To even exist in public life?

And let’s not dwell too long on the fact that the person overseeing this sham investigation — and that was, in fact, Loretta Lynch; she never actually recused herself — dictated from the outset that the investigation would not be allowed to find any incriminating evidence about Hillary.

Source: New York Times Reporter Reveals That James Comey Had a Spy In Loretta Lynch’s Office, and Knew That She Had Declared She Would Not Permit the Clinton Email Scandal to Go Very Far

 

‘Whistleblower’ Lawyer: Client Had ‘Contact with Presidential Candidates’ 

UPDATE:

The leaker is tied to Joe Biden.

More impropriety.

The lawyers representing the “whistleblower” at the center of the impeachment inquiry conceded Wednesday they “had come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties.”

Attorneys Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, however, insisted in a statement that the whistleblower’s relationship with the politicians was limited to their role as “elected officials,” not as candidates.

Sure they were. Just like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch discussed ‘grandkids’ on the tarmac.

Zaid and Bakaj asserted that the whistleblower “has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party.” The lawyers, however, left open the possibility that the leaker did advise a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate before his or her run for office.

Source: ‘Whistleblower’ Lawyer: Client Had ‘Contact with Presidential Candidates’ 

 

Glenn Beck uncovers MORE evidence of DNC collusion with Ukraine to sabotage the Trump campaign in 2016

On Wednesday’s show, Glenn Beck was back at the chalkboard to uncover the behind-the-scenes’ connections of lawyer Alexandra Chalupa, the Democratic National Committee’s so-called “part-time consultant” who can be traced back to the very origin of the Trump-Russia investigation.

In a 2017 report, Politico blew the lid off Democratic National Committee’s efforts to help the Hillary Clinton campaign by digging up damaging information on then-candidate Donald Trump and his advisers ahead of the 2016 election. According to Politico, the DNC hired Ukrainian-American lawyer Alexandra Chalupa to consult with “top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia.”

In response, Chalupa issued the following statement on her Facebook page:

I was a part time consultant for the DNC running a ethnic engagement program. I was not an opposition researcher for the DNC, and the DNC never asked me to go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information.

“First of all … that’s a pretty amazing part-time gig,” Glenn commented. “The DNC paid her [Chalupa] $71,000 in the election year alone. Wow, that is a lot of money for part time. Good gig, if you can get it.”

“Secondly, even if the DNC did not explicitly ask her to pump the Ukrainian Embassy for information, no one, including Chalupa, denies that she was defiantly pumping them for information, and it was all while she was on the DNC’s payroll,” Glenn added.

Watch the video below to hear Glenn expose the stunning proof of Chalupa’s role as an opposition researcher in 2016 and her “coincidental” connections with the DNC, Clinton’s campaign, and the government of Ukraine.

Click here to view original web page at www.theblaze.com

Behind The Network Of Outside, Left-Wing Groups Pushing Racial Policies In Cities, Counties Across America

  • Many cities and counties are adopting radical policies that see every aspect of government operations through the “lens” of race.
  • A network of George Soros-backed activist groups has worked to push these policies at the most local level of government, where there is little scrutiny.
  • The policies are justified by citing research attributed to the University of Southern California, which actually comes from an outfit connected to the activist groups and whose work economists say is junk science.

    In cities and counties across America, local politicians have in recent months begun proposing comprehensive race-based policies such as redrawing school boundaries to dismantle schools with too many white or Asian students.

    They have pushed for radical changes that have roiled even liberal-leaning constituents. The justification on all of their lips is oddly similar: “Equity.” The same buzzwords appear again and again.

    “School board meetings suddenly became like Mad Libs. They started repeating certain phrases, jamming them into every sentence. It was very odd,” Margaret McCreary, a Fairfax County, Virginia, parent who eventually learned that the board members were using the “equity” language to push a proposal that could move her children out of their schools, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

    “It seemed like they were all in cahoots to do something, but at first we didn’t know what to make of it, because we didn’t know what they were talking about,” she said.

    Fairfax was one of multiple local governments to pass sweeping changes requiring every policy to be seen through the “lens” of race. The changes were justified by academic research from the University of Southern California (USC) that was tough for any city or county, rich or poor, to pass up: If they enacted certain policies, they were told, the cities’ economies could gain billions of dollars.

    An investigation by the DCNF found that across the country, these changes are being pushed on local governments by a constellation of groups who share the same funders, including George Soros. One of those groups alone is active in 33 cities and counties covering 1 in 10 Americans.

    A group tied to USC called the Program for Environmental and Regional Equity (PERE) functions to create research — at the behest of funders — that promises billions of dollars in economic growth. Another set of groups introduce the research to individual cities and counties, where it is used to justify a mandate to include “equity” in every government policy. The language is often vague and comprised of obscure jargon.

    That’s the stage Montgomery County, Maryland, is at now, where an official sympathetic to the movement, Uma Ahluwalia, told The Washington Post: “It’s nice to throw that word, ‘equity,’ around, but what does it mean?”

Click here to view original web page at dailycaller.com

Michelle Malkin Follows the Money Behind the Open Borders Movement

WASHINGTON—Michelle Malkin, author and political commentator, was inspired to write her newest book after caravans of migrants from Central America began piling illegally across the U.S.–Mexico border in November 2018.

The book, “Open Borders Inc. Who’s Funding America’s Destruction?”, is a 500-page compendium that makes the case that U.S. sovereignty is on the brink of being lost, sold out through endless illegal immigration, amnesty deals, sanctuary policies, the refugee program, and systematic attacks on immigration enforcement.

Malkin’s investigative premise was to follow the money, and this sentence perhaps best sums up her claim: “The open borders conspiracy enabling unrelenting waves of migrant outlaws is a colossal profit-seeking venture cloaked in humanitarian virtue.”

Malkin names hundreds of nonprofit groups and churches, with billion-dollar budgets, that are involved in eliminating America’s borders and creating a global governance. She names corporations, Silicon Valley CEOs, and Hollywood elites who push for a borderless America, and the liberal media that she says is complicit. She calls hedge fund billionaire George Soros the CEO of “Open Borders Inc.”

Malkin said billions, if not trillions, of dollars are involved.

“I think what’s shocking is not the fact that you have a single hedge fund billionaire in George Soros—who has now earmarked $18 billion out of his $25 billion net worth to go to these kinds of programs—but I think not enough Americans pay attention to the kind of philanthropy that is destroying America,” Malkin said.

“You cannot underestimate the ripple effect of that private philanthropy. I think what’s going to shock people is the amount of taxpayer funding that is building off and leveraging the Soros piece of it. The refugee resettlement program itself has given billions of dollars to religious nonprofits that I’m sure a lot of churchgoers have no idea is going on.”

Click here to view original web page at www.theepochtimes.com

‘Whistleblower’ Worked for a Current 2020 Democrat Presidential Candidate

Yeah, this is another major problem with this story.

Via Red State:

Earlier today, I wrote on the news that the Trump-Ukraine “whistle-blower” was a registered Democrat. On its own, that’s somewhat telling news, but perhaps not overwhelmingly meaningful without more information. In my article, I opined why I thought CNN chose to report the story in the first place given their editorial leans.

Now, you might ask yourself why CNN would report this. The answer is simple. It’s called getting ahead of a story to help frame it. We’ve seen this over and over when damaging information that could possibly help Donald Trump is on the verge of being exposed. Instead of letting it drop, legacy news agencies run and get anonymous quotes to try to get the information out there while presenting it in the best possible light…

The goal here is to get the political affiliation of the whistle-blower out there early so that when more evidence of bias drops, Democrats can claim it’s old news and not relevant to the complaint.

Games are being played here. Don’t be fooled.

Like clockwork, we’ve now got more information on the bias of the whistle-blower and I was exactly right. Not only was a he registered Democrat, the guy worked on the campaign of a current 2020 candidate.

Source: News Breaks That the Whistle-Blower Worked for a Current 2020 Democrat Presidential Candidate

No wonder they are parading a new ‘whistleblower’ to make legitimate concerns about this one go away.