by Casey | Oct 11, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy, Media Bias
Quoting from the New York Post.
Lynch had made major career advances in the 1990s under President Bill Clinton — and her boss, President Barack Obama, plainly supported Hillary’s candidacy. Plus, Obama was also implicated in the scandal, since he’d exchanged multiple emails with Clinton at her non-government address — a fact they were all keeping from the public.
Stewart reports that Comey’s “highly placed informant” indicated that Lynch wouldn’t let the FBI investigation add to Clinton’s woes. An email reportedly from the head of the Democratic National Committee assured a civilian that “Lynch wouldn’t let the Clinton investigation get very far, suggesting that Lynch would protect Clinton,” Stewart writes.
Can we load every single person who vouched for the incorruptibility of James Comey and the senior FBI into a trebuchet and catapult them into the sea? Why are these people still permitted to comment? To even exist in public life?
And let’s not dwell too long on the fact that the person overseeing this sham investigation — and that was, in fact, Loretta Lynch; she never actually recused herself — dictated from the outset that the investigation would not be allowed to find any incriminating evidence about Hillary.
Source: New York Times Reporter Reveals That James Comey Had a Spy In Loretta Lynch’s Office, and Knew That She Had Declared She Would Not Permit the Clinton Email Scandal to Go Very Far
‘Whistleblower‘ Lawyer: Client Had ‘Contact with Presidential Candidates’
by Casey | Oct 11, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy, Media Bias
UPDATE:
The leaker is tied to Joe Biden.
More impropriety.
The lawyers representing the “whistleblower” at the center of the impeachment inquiry conceded Wednesday they “had come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties.”
Attorneys Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, however, insisted in a statement that the whistleblower’s relationship with the politicians was limited to their role as “elected officials,” not as candidates.
Sure they were. Just like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch discussed ‘grandkids’ on the tarmac.
Zaid and Bakaj asserted that the whistleblower “has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party.” The lawyers, however, left open the possibility that the leaker did advise a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate before his or her run for office.
Source: ‘Whistleblower’ Lawyer: Client Had ‘Contact with Presidential Candidates’
by Casey | Oct 11, 2019 | Blog, Idiocracy
Par for the course for the ‘tolerant’ left.
Left-wing rioters attacked supporters of President Donald Trump leaving a rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota on Thursday evening — assaulting them in groups, setting fire to pro-Trump hats, and attacking the police.
Riot police stood by as members of Antifa were seen dragging steel fences away from the Target Center. They were filmed by Elijah Schaffer, a correspondent for The Blaze, a conservative news site — who was maced as he filmed.
Local Minneapolis Star-Tribune reporter Liz Sawyer noted there were several hundred rioters, and that some were singling out Trump supporters and surrounding them in groups before attacking them. Some also attacked police:
More at the link.
Source: Left-wing Rioters Attack Trump Supporters Leaving Minneapolis Rally | Breitbart
by Casey | Oct 11, 2019 | Blog, Conspiracy
On Wednesday’s show, Glenn Beck was back at the chalkboard to uncover the behind-the-scenes’ connections of lawyer Alexandra Chalupa, the Democratic National Committee‘s so-called “part-time consultant” who can be traced back to the very origin of the Trump-Russia investigation.
In a 2017 report, Politico blew the lid off Democratic National Committee’s efforts to help the Hillary Clinton campaign by digging up damaging information on then-candidate Donald Trump and his advisers ahead of the 2016 election. According to Politico, the DNC hired Ukrainian-American lawyer Alexandra Chalupa to consult with “top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia.”
In response, Chalupa issued the following statement on her Facebook page:
I was a part time consultant for the DNC running a ethnic engagement program. I was not an opposition researcher for the DNC, and the DNC never asked me to go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information.
“First of all … that’s a pretty amazing part-time gig,” Glenn commented. “The DNC paid her [Chalupa] $71,000 in the election year alone. Wow, that is a lot of money for part time. Good gig, if you can get it.”
“Secondly, even if the DNC did not explicitly ask her to pump the Ukrainian Embassy for information, no one, including Chalupa, denies that she was defiantly pumping them for information, and it was all while she was on the DNC’s payroll,” Glenn added.
Watch the video below to hear Glenn expose the stunning proof of Chalupa’s role as an opposition researcher in 2016 and her “coincidental” connections with the DNC, Clinton’s campaign, and the government of Ukraine.
Click here to view original web page at www.theblaze.com
