Hour 2
Kyrsten Sinema Won’t Support Eliminating Filibuster, ‘Not Open To Changing Her Mind’
Pfizer Vaccine Claimed a Runaway Success in Israel with 0.015% Infection Rate
Coronavirus Vaccine Patch Could Protect Against All COVID Strains
Researchers are developing color-changing stickers for masks to detect COVID-19
Regeneron: Antibody Cocktail 100 Percent Effective Against Symptomatic COVID-19 Infections
Regeneron: Antibody Cocktail 100 Percent Effective Against Symptomatic COVID-19 Infections
Woman Behind Bernie Sanders’ Iconic Mittens Quit Making Them Because High Taxes Killed Her Business
DDoSers are abusing Microsoft RDP to make attacks more powerful
FLASHBACK: Dead Parkland Student Brought Back to Life in Creepy Anti-Gun PAC Commercial
Joe Biden Suffers Multiple Fractures to His Foot While Playing With His Dog
Los Angeles County Banned Outdoor Dining. There’s Zero Evidence It Spreads COVID-19.
Kentucky Coffee Shop Owner Loses License After Bucking Coronavirus Restrictions
It’s Not ‘Woke’ To Be Broke: Major Liberal Cause Turns Out To Be Just Scheme Enriching A Few
FLASHBACK: Biden’s cancer charity, to honor son, spent 3 million on staff salaries but zero on research, taxes show
We were discussing Nancy Pelosi’s hypocritical remarks that the extra money you get in your paycheck because of the GOP tax cuts was ‘crumbs.’ In 2011 she said an extra $40 per paycheck was going to make a big difference for middle-class families. A caller called to say that even an extra $40 meant he could take his wife out on a date. That would stimulate the economy. I pointed out earlier in the segment that wealthy people don’t think an extra $40 is a big deal, but for Americans juggling which bill they pay on which paycheck, it is a very big difference.
Then Chris called to prove my point. A savage beatdown was warranted. Here’s a link to Cafe Navarre’s website to prove that you can eat there for less than $40. http://www.cafenavarre.co/menus
Berry said she was inspired to start the petition after watching a documentary about the history of enslavement. Currently, she is enrolled in a social justice class where her teacher asked students to consider the type of change they want to make in the world.
In 2002 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said that the lawful use of deadly force by the police may be ruled unlawful if the police themselves “created the need to use force” by acting in an illegal manner. “Where an officer intentionally or recklessly provokes a violent confrontation, if the provocation is an independent Fourth Amendment violation,” the 9th Circuit held in Billington v. Smith, the officer “may be held liable for his otherwise defensive use of deadly force.”
