The New York Times has had a hard time telling the truth about Israel and Jews – this week they published a crossword in the shape of a swastika. @EndJewHatred decided to help them out during this time of rising Jew hate.
Save this video of Bill Gates advocating for a reduced global population because the media will memory-hole it and gaslight you. https://t.co/PpKWfZ18At
— Casey Hendrickson 🎙 Syndicated Radio Host (@caseythehost) December 19, 2022
ABC’s @MarthaRaddatz blames Repubs for “open border” message: “I don’t think I’ve ever heard President Biden say ‘we have an open border, come on over,’ but people I have heard people say it are you (@GregAbbott_TX), are former President Trump, are Ron DeSantis…” #ThisWeekpic.twitter.com/Zmp5iHDJP8
While @MarthaRaddatz is out here LYING about what Biden said to migrants, she had a very different tune in March of 2021 when several migrants told her that Biden told them to come and she said herself the 'message was mixed, at best.'https://t.co/PqJzmYWRj3
— Casey Hendrickson 🎙 Syndicated Radio Host (@caseythehost) December 19, 2022
"An earlier version of this article misstated the death rate for Covid patients. It is now 1% or less, not about 3%. Because of an editing error, the corrected sentence omitted the phrase 'diagnosed with' in reference to the rate.https://t.co/qqEeDCK0wI
Hour 3
This Chinese propaganda starts at the university level.
Cincinnati professor on leave after calling COVID-19 the ‘Chinese virus’
https://www.foxnews.com/us/professor-suspended-chinese-virus-email
Guess what school has direct ties to the Chinese government?
UC plans to open campus in China
https://www.wlwt.com/article/uc-plans-to-open-campus-in-china/3532166
It’s all over social media.
China used internet troll ‘army’ to shape coronavirus narrative: report
https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-used-internet-troll-army-to-shape-coronavirus-narrative-report
Trump Says US COVID-19 Deaths ‘Far Exaggerated,’ Blames CDC for Bad Statistics
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-says-us-covid-19-deaths-far-exaggerated-blames-cdc-for-bad-statistics_3641649.html
Fauci on Trump Claim Coronavirus Casualty Count Is Exaggerated: ‘Deaths Are Real Deaths,’ ‘That’s Not Fake’
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/01/03/fauci-on-trump-claim-coronavirus-casualty-count-is-exaggerated-deaths-are-real-deaths-thats-not-fake/
Friendly reminder, Fauci just admitted to lying to all of you in order to manipulate you into doing what he wanted you to do.
Can you ever trust a health official who, not only has been wrong the entire pandemic, but admitted to lying to you about it?
Remember when Brian Tabor, president of the Indiana Hospital Association, staight up lied to you all by saying: “”Hospitals do not receive more money when a death is coded as COVID,” he said, calling the claim a myth.
USA Today did a fact-check on this claim and found that hospitals do, in fact, get more money for COVID deaths. Dr. Redfield at the CDC testified that this does happen while highlighting there’s no evidence proving widespread manipulation of the death total for additional funds.
Bottom line is health officials keep lying to you. The media keeps lying to you. They keep getting caught. You can’t be surprised by outrage.
I’ve already highlighted dozens of stories involving thousands of non-COVID deaths being listed as COVID in the US.
I’m not saying hospitals are doing this mislabeling on purpose. Paperwork errors happen all the time. However, let’s be honest. The American hospital apparatus has a LONG rich history of inflating bills to maximize profits. This is an uncontroversial claim that is universally know and derided. Suddenly, we are to expect those same people magically become the arbiters of truth and honestly?
FLASHBACK: CDC Reveals Hospitals Counted 130,000 Heart Attacks, Flu and Bacterial Pneumonia As COVID-19 Deaths
Obviously, this isn’t surprising or newinformation. However, it’s always nice to have empirical data to back up your case.
It’s no secret that Twitter censors and shadow-bans conservatives. The Gateway Pundit has reported on this extensively over the past few years. We reported in July 2018 that Twitter has long been accused of censoring conservatives. Twitter was indeed censoring and shadowbanning the President of the United States, Donald Trump’s twitter account, @realDonaldTrump. Twitter is […]
Luckily, through the use of standard statistical methods—similar to those commonly applied to calculate confidence intervals in the physical and social sciences—one may determine that the underlying population disparity (i.e. the disparity between liberal and conservative behavioral norms) would have to be quite large in order for there to be any significant likelihood of observing a randomly constituted 22-point data set characterized by the above-described 21:1 ratio. Indeed, assuming some randomness in enforcement unrelated to bias, one would have to assume that conservatives were at least four times as likely as liberals to violate Twitter’s neutrally applied terms of service to produce even a 5% chance (the standard benchmark) that a 22-data point sample would yield a result as skewed as 21-1.
Left-wing activists on college campus regularly engage in the practice of de-platforming—including the use of violence or the threat thereof as a means to prevent someone from speaking. Victims of this practice typically are conservative figures such as Ben Shapiro and Ann Coulter. At Berkley, when Milo Yiannopoulos tried to give a speech, a large mob threw stones and fireworks at police officers, and attacked members of the crowd. Around the same time, commentators noted that during the 2016 president campaign, when Bernie Sanders visited Liberty University, the evangelical institution run be Jerry Falwell, Jr., his message was met with “polite skepticism.”
Are we to believe that while prominent figures on the left encourage uncivil and even violent tactics, both on an off college campuses, their online behaviour is, with the solitary exception of Rose McGowan, universally exemplary?
Harassment and the advocacy of violence are serious issues, and there is nothing morally objectionable about social media companies removing this kind of content from their platforms. However, such laudable objectives should not be used as cover to prosecute ideological campaigns. While social media platforms are private companies, anti-discrimination laws generally allow legislators avenues to address businesses that exhibit unacceptable biases in how they treat the public.
