Hour 1: Latest Developments on Voter Integrity Concerns in U.S. Elections.
SCOTUS Allows Virginia Voter Eligibility Audit: The Supreme Court has permitted Virginia to remove potentially ineligible voters, a move with implications for those concerned about voter integrity in U.S. elections. Read more.
Colorado Voting Machine Security Issues: Colorado’s Secretary of State “inadvertently” leaked sensitive voting machine passwords, further fueling concerns around election security.
Florida Ballot Disposal Incident: A Florida election worker was dismissed after completed ballots were discovered abandoned roadside, raising questions about secure ballot handling.
Dominion Voting Machine ‘Glitch’: Just days before the election, Dominion voting machines faced a reported glitch, drawing criticism over reliability and contributing to broader voter integrity concerns. More details.
GOP Pursues Voter Roll Accuracy: GOP-led states are now aggressively ensuring non-citizens are removed from voter rolls, despite Vice President Kamala Harris’s objections.
Kamala Harris Reallocates Campaign Funds in North Carolina: Harris withdrew nearly $2 million in planned ad spending from North Carolina, a strategic adjustment in a key battleground state.
Dearborn Mayor’s Announcement Affects Harris Campaign: The Dearborn mayor’s recent 2024 statement poses another hurdle for Harris’s campaign.
President Biden’s ‘Garbage’ Comment Fallout: Public discourse intensifies after President Biden’s recent comment calling half of Americans “garbage.”
Hour 2: Media Narratives and Voter Integrity Concerns in U.S. Elections
Trump War Room Shares Controversial Geraldo Reaction: Geraldo Rivera’s response to Puerto Rico-related jokes has polarized reactions, underscoring tensions in political rhetoric.
Liberal Comedian’s Stereotype Remarks Spark Controversy: A comedian at a Tim Walz rally implied stereotypes about Mexicans, provoking reactions and impacting voter perception.
Biden’s ‘Garbage’ Comment Spin by CBS: CBS News faces backlash after framing Biden’s “garbage” remark about Trump supporters.
Kamala Harris’s Response to Biden’s Remarks: Harris’s comments on Biden’s “garbage” remark about Americans have drawn scrutiny, revealing divisions within the administration’s messaging.
Trump Supporters Labeled ‘Nazis’: Amid rising tensions, Trump supporters are frequently labeled as Nazis, a trend that Harris and other administration officials appear to tolerate.
Tim Walz’s Nazi Rhetoric Directed at Trump Supporters: Walz has intensified rhetoric against Trump supporters, framing them with Nazi comparisons.
Kamala Harris Claims on Social Security and Medicare: Harris continues to circulate debunked claims that Trump sought to cut Social Security and Medicare each year.
13 Misleading Claims in Kamala Harris’s Washington Speech: Harris’s recent speech contains a series of misleading assertions, impacting her credibility on the campaign trail.
MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace’s Election Remarks: Wallace claimed the election stakes involve “life and death” for women, despite ongoing access to necessary medical care in all U.S. states.
Hour 3: Voter Integrity and Indiana’s Political Landscape
Interview with Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita: Attorney General Rokita provides insights into Indiana’s efforts to maintain voter roll accuracy and safeguard election integrity.
Twitter Buzz: Liz MacDonald and Tim Runs His Mouth’s viral tweets on Trump Derangement Syndrome highlight the psychological toll of Trump’s influence on his opponents.
Key Takeaway: These recent controversies and policy decisions underscore the heightened focus on voter integrity concerns in U.S. elections. Whether through state-led initiatives to verify voter eligibility or the public’s scrutiny of voting machine reliability, maintaining a transparent and secure election process remains essential.
"[Biden], Harris, the Democrat Party, and most of their campaign do believe that half the country is garbage. They've also said people who go to Trump rallies are Nazis — so it's pretty apparent the disdain with which they hold half the country." @ScottJenningsKYpic.twitter.com/JQVaiSklWY
She claimed this wasn’t ‘hyperbole’ or an ‘exaggeration’ but it is. Also, there isn’t a single place in the US where you can’t get an abortion if the life of the mother is at risk.
I can’t imagine not knowing my wife well enough to know exactly how she’d vote.
I can’t imagine my wife not talking to me about any of these controversial topics.
I can’t believe there’s a campaign that encourages women to lie and deceive their husbands. pic.twitter.com/Ibevl098Nu
Interview: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita joins us.
Looks like CBS 60 Minutes has another major new editing and now a censorship controversy on its hands. Tom Homan, former acting ICE director under Trump, says 60 Minutes made massive edits & censored its 2-hour intvw w Homan because it had a biased agenda to attack Trump about…
Voter integrity concerns are shaping both the 2024 election landscape and public trust in the electoral process across Indiana and the United States. From Supreme Court rulings on voter eligibility to security concerns around voting machines, the actions taken now will influence how voters perceive the safety and reliability of their vote. For states like Indiana, where efforts to maintain accurate voter rolls are underway, these measures may serve as a benchmark for other states aiming to protect election transparency. Ensuring a secure voting environment is not just a procedural necessity—it’s a foundational step to maintain public confidence in democratic institutions and uphold the principle of every legitimate vote being counted.
After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story. More… https://t.co/uJtfsNTo37
The latest Daily Show Prep: Thursday, Oct. 24 dives deep into the recent media frenzy with a focus on debunking yet another Trump hit piece. This time, the Atlantic tried to smear Donald Trump with a false narrative about his military stance. But thanks to insider accounts, including those from former officials, the story has been thoroughly debunked. Even Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff stepped in to call out the falsehoods surrounding General Kelly’s statements. This breakdown offers a clear view of how the media continues to push these hit pieces without verifying facts. (Designed by AIPRM).
Pence’s Chief of Staff Debunks Trump Military Story
A key piece of evidence in this Trump hit piece debunked story comes from Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff. He publicly refuted General Kelly’s claims, stating outright that the narrative pushed by the Atlantic is entirely fabricated. In a world where fact-checking seems to be optional, it’s refreshing to see high-level officials standing up for the truth. The media’s role in spreading unverified information about Trump’s stance on the military has been under fire, and this new evidence only adds to the pressure.
9 in 10 Voters Demand Kamala Harris Transcript
Alongside the Trump hit piece debunked, the spotlight is also on CBS and its recent interview with Kamala Harris. Polls indicate that 9 out of 10 voters want the full transcript of her interview released. Trump is even considering suing CBS if the network refuses to release the entire interview. This comes after the FCC Commissioner hinted at a potential probe into CBS over the distortions made during the interview. The constant media manipulations, from Trump to Harris, are becoming clearer by the day.
Trump to Sue CBS Over Interview Manipulation?
Another important revelation in Trump hit piece debunked is Trump’s potential lawsuit against CBS. The network is accused of distorting his interview with Kamala Harris, leaving out key details that could swing public opinion. Trump is no stranger to legal battles, and this time he’s taking aim at media giants who continue to mislead the public. It’s a battle over transparency, and Trump isn’t backing down without a fight.
Harris Struggles with Word Salad Once Again
In a now-infamous CNN Town Hall, Kamala Harris fell into what many are calling “Word Salad City.” This latest blunder has only fueled public frustration. Paired with Liz Cheney’s dwindling political capital, the political landscape continues to shift. The Trump hit piece debunked reminds readers that the media isn’t just failing on Trump’s front, but also on accurately portraying Harris’ repeated stumbles during key moments.
MSNBC Fails to Push Racism Narrative with Black Voters
The Trump hit piece debunked post also highlights MSNBC’s failed attempt to stir the pot with Black women voters. The network’s push to frame certain issues as race-related didn’t resonate with the very group they were targeting. Voters are becoming increasingly savvy to media manipulation, and this recent failure only cements that notion. The lack of traction for these narratives showcases a growing demand for authentic reporting rather than manufactured outrage.
Veteran Kicked Off Delta Flight Sparks Outrage
Rounding off the Trump hit piece debunked, a story that is grabbing headlines involves a veteran who was kicked off a Delta flight for wearing a shirt advocating for suicide awareness among veterans. This incident has caused public outrage, raising questions about corporate policies and the treatment of those who have served. It’s yet another example of how social issues are intertwined with media narratives and how public opinion is often shaped by incomplete stories.
In conclusion, the latest issue of Daily Show Prep on Thursday, Oct. 24, effectively dismantles the recent media frenzy surrounding another Trump hit piece. By examining the facts and providing clarity, the show reinforces the importance of critical thinking in today’s media landscape. For those seeking to stay informed and engaged, be sure to follow my social media accounts for updates, insights, and more discussions on the pressing issues of our time. Join the conversation and empower yourself with the truth.
In today’s Daily Show Prep, the topics focus on Trump’s McDonald’s visit, sparking controversy and humor, and Kamala Harris’s questionable claims about working at McDonald’s. Inflation takes center stage as Kroger defends against accusations of price-gouging, explaining pricing in context. There’s growing frustration with inflation as middle-class Americans struggle to keep up. The third hour covers election controversies, including critiques of Kamala’s evolving positions and Liz Cheney’s false J6 narrative. With 52% feeling worse off than four years ago, the 2024 election is heating up.
For the full breakdown, visit the source links and follow the discussion.
MEDIA: “Trump says — without evidence — that Kamala never worked at McDonalds.”
REALITY: there is ZERO evidence that Kamala worked at McDonald’s. Not a single former co-worker has come forward, no McDonalds franchise has vouched for her, no pictures. Nothing.
The Washington Times @WashTimes Has been insufferable lately with their bs stories.
The famous 'without evidence' line the media has used on Trump ever since he came down the escalator.
Harris provided no evidence. The evidence we have says she's lying.…
— Casey Hendrickson 🎙 Syndicated Radio Host (@caseythehost) October 20, 2024
Pretty pathetic reporting and analysis here. Collins and Stelter just continue to accept Kamala's McDonald's job claim as fact, and then they pretend they don't know where the questions about her job first originated. https://t.co/8qXiY8LGGm
Claims that a Kroger executive ‘admitted to price-gouging’ are false. Saying milk and eggs were increased beyond the inflation rate isn’t gouging, by definition.
Price gouging is when a seller raises prices on goods or services to an unreasonable or unfair level, usually during a time of crisis. Some ways to identify price gouging include: Extraordinarily high prices: Businesses can increase prices, but they shouldn’t raise them excessively to take advantage of a crisis.
Comparing prices to similar products: Some states prohibit significant price increases compared to other products. For example, if bottled water is priced at double the cost of similar products, that may be price gouging.
Increases exceeding a certain percentage: In some states, increases exceeding 20% may be considered price gouging.
Price gouging laws vary by jurisdiction, but they generally come into effect during declared states of emergency and focus on essential goods. In most states, price gouging is a violation of unfair or deceptive trade practices law.
Someone should ask Mark Cuban why Dirk Nowitzki’s ‘brother’ filed a lawsuit against him, alleging that during a drunken night, Mark made an inappropriate move on him and claimed that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
This is absolutely a big deal. Don’t buy the bullshit otherwise.
It was not a standard op. The MAL raid was an unprecedented action with significant potential for confusion and blue on blue issues and conflict. It also involved competing equities between federal agencies (FBI &…
Totally SOP: Describing suspect as former president
And the former feds pretending they know exactly how every scenario in this dangerous raid would have been handled–they don't. There is no precedent. pic.twitter.com/yl3FgTomcl
Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (Rep-NY) verbally rips off the tiny democrat testicles of Congressman Dan Goldman (Dem-NY) as she gives him an education on political lawfare being used for election interference. At the end when she says “I yield back,” I believe she was sending a… pic.twitter.com/5cW0EiKYul
People deserve correct & helpful information about Diabetes! Introducing the American Diabetes Society. It will offer info & recipes that actually lowers blood sugars and A1c's. The ADS will NEVER take money from big-food or big-pharma and will be financially transparent to all!… pic.twitter.com/bnjJPMhf2p
