I predicted the blue checkmark brigade would circle the wagons and claim James O’Keefe listening in on CNN meetings and posting a video where he asked Jeff Zucker a question in that meeting was somehow wrong, immoral, or illegal.
Not surprisingly, social media is ablaze with those frivolous accusations.
Any, so-called, ‘journalist’ who is upset with O’Keefe’s actions here is a dishonest and untrustworthy waste of your time.
I’ve been telling you this for years, and it came up again on Friday’s show during open lines. The oceans aren’t warming, and aren’t rising. Data for years has shown this. Eventually, the climate alarmists were going to have to stop pretending they were. Naturally, this would only force them to justify they’ve been wrong all of these years because the situation was somehow worse than they thought. Regardless, it illustrates they are making it up as they go.
Yep. You read that right. The ‘oceans are rising crowd’ has explained the lack of oceans … you know … actually rising by saying there’s so much water that the oceans can’t rise. The ocean floor is collapsing!
So much extra water is being added into the world’s oceans from melting glaciers that the ocean floor is sinking underneath its increasing weight. This ocean floor deformation also means we have miscalculated just how much ocean levels are rising and the problem could be far worse than previously believed.
Over the past 20 years, ocean basins have sunk an average of 0.004 inches per year. This means that the ocean is 0.08 inches deeper than it was two decades ago. While this small fragment of an inch may not seem much, oceans cover 70 percent of our planet, making the problem bigger than it seems at an initial glance.
A listener had called on Friday during open lines to ask me about something he’d just heard elsewhere. Apparently, someone had said climate realists (deniers) only had the satellite data that shows no warming is happening to defend their position. You know, the raw factual data. I explained the numerous times we’ve literally caught climate alarmists, who’s careers and financial well-being depend on peddling man-made warming, colluding to manufacture warming data. How they’ve gone back centuries to erase old temperature data on the records to ‘adjust’ it to be colder so it appears we’ve warmed more than we actually have. I then went into the oceans. How they used to measure ocean temperature date, and how we do it now. The new methods show no warming. Next was the ‘rise’ in oceans. Something that hasn’t materialized.
These people saying the hard empirical data is irrelevant are the same people who make predictions purely on computer models. Models they have to molest the empirical data with to get the result they want. They are literally telling people to believe their guess more than the facts.
I pointed to a recent article in which whistleblowers exposed the fabrication of rising ocean levels to further illustrate my point.
In a new paper published in Earth Systems and Environment this month, Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier uncover evidence that Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) overseers appear to have been engaging in the “highly questionable” and “suspicious” practice of adjusting historical tide gauge data to show recent accelerated sea level rise where no such acceleration (or rise) exists.
So … we have people still fabricating data to pretend the oceans are rising while simultaneously having the same fear-mongers saying the oceans are sinking. Can you trust people who’ve been telling you the oceans are rising for years without any data to back them up? The same people who now admit they’ve been wrong and the oceans are sinking. If the oceans were so heavy that the ocean floor was collapsing and leading to sinking oceans … why did they lie to you to say the oceans were rising?
They were either wrong, or lying. Those are the only two options, and both should prove to you their dire predictions aren’t worth much.
Al Gore is pretending the deep freeze we are having now is because of global warming, and he’s lying when he tells you he predicted it. He said the North Pole would have no ice by now, but I digress. Global warming causes global cooling, and now rising oceans cause sinking oceans. This isn’t science, it’s cultism.
Climate alarmism … brought to you by the same people who can’t accurately predict the weather within the next 48 hours. You can totally trust them to predict the weather decades from now though.
All of this makes me think of my all-time favorite clip I play for my audience. Congressman Hank Johnson (D-GA) in 2010.
He’s still in office.
One more thing … in 2014 I did an MNC-TV video on how they’d discovered massive amounts of water under the Earth’s crust. At the time, geologists believed the water under the Earth’s crust was keeping the surface water levels of the oceans in balance. Seems relevant now.
I’ve often asked this question in my writings and on my show. Most often, in discussions with the ignorant about Saddam being the innocent victim of Bush/Cheney aggression.
No clear answer has been given by pacifists to the question: “What would justify war?”
The pacifist hordes often give conflicting answers. For example, Ron Paul (who claims a form of pacifism) was interviewed by John Stossel in 2007, and was asked what would justify a war.
If you’re attacked, you have a right and an obligation to defend (your) country. I do not believe there is ever a moral justification to start the war.
That sounds nice, but I found Paul’s answer interesting, and vague. What constitutes an attack? Is it on your property, your citizens, or must it be within your national borders? Pacifists have been unable to clarify this position for me over the years.
What does this have to do with Iraq, and my greater point later?
Before the 2003 Iraq invasion, Saddam was repeatedly ‘attacking’ the USand her allies in a little discussed conflict in the no fly zones. Yet Ron Paul, and others, have frequently said that there was no justification for the invasion of Iraq. So … shooting/attacking US citizens, and destroying US property is not an attack?
I’m of a different viewpoint, and my training to invade Iraq under Clinton proved that even Slick Willy agreed with me.
So why bring this up now? Iraq was a resounding success, and Saddam is dead. Because we may be heading for another war.
Tensions have been rising with Pakistan for years. The killing of Osama bin Laden only catapulted those tensions to the mainstream. During the aftermath of that operation, we clearly learned that Pakistan is no friend of the US. Yet, something far worse was kept from us.
A group of American military officers and Afghan officials had just finished a five-hour meeting with their Pakistani hosts in a village schoolhouse settling a border dispute when they were ambushed — by the Pakistanis.
Yep. Ambushed by the Pakistanis … ahem … allegedly.
Maj. Larry J. Bauguess lost his life in the attack.
This blatant act of war was covered up by both the Pakistanis and Washington. In fact, Pakistan has been well-known to retaliate for collateral damage by US forces with open attacks on US personnel.
Some will blame America for the incident, and say that Pakistan was just retaliating for their losses. An interesting point, albeit one that ignores Pakistan’s hindering our intelligence, and often openly helping the enemy against us.
Then there’s Iran. We know they are sending weapons across the border into Iraq to help kill Americans. There have even been clashes with US and Iranian military forces. Something that was also kept quiet, and has happened more than once.
Right about now someone will say that none of this would happen if we weren’t there to begin with, so we are still the aggressor. That’s about as intelligent as inviting someone over for dinner, and then calling them a burglar.
Am I calling for war with Pakistan or Iran? No.
Were those two incidents justification for war in my opinion? Yes.
I’m saddened that neither party has an option for president that touts legit military credentials. We have, after all, been at war for a decade with no truly experienced military veteran in the White House. Going forward, we may not have an option for peace either. It makes me wonder … how different things would be if a competent military commander were also sitting in the White House.
In a new paper published in Earth Systems and Environment this month, Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier uncover evidence that Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) overseers appear to have been engaging in the “highly questionable” and “suspicious” practice of adjusting historical tide gauge data to show recent accelerated 