Episode 11: Bunker Banter

Episode 11: Bunker Banter

Season 2: Episode 11 of the Common Veterans Podcast brings a level of fun and unpredictability! In this episode, titled “Bunker Banter: The Common Veterans Night”, our hosts take a break from their usual deep-dive discussions to bring into the world of Game Night. But this isn't just any game night—this time, AI joins the party, and things take an unexpected turn.

In this special episode, the Common Veterans decided to embrace by using AI to help craft a unique game. What makes even better? No one is held accountable for the things that come of their mouths! Imagine a combination of quick-witted banter, unpredictable , and a rule that ensures whatever is said stays within the bunker.

With AI generating random and often hilarious prompts, our veterans navigate a maze of absurd scenarios, surprising revelations, and hilarious conversations. Whether it’s sharing outrageous stories or up with unexpected answers to AI-generated questions, the game night keeps the fun rolling and the laughter uncontrollable.

While Common Veterans typically focuses on topics like veterans' issues, stories from the field, and practical advice, this episode offers a refreshing of pace. Sometimes, the best way to connect and unwind is through a lighthearted game with friends. And that’s exactly what this episode offers—a chance for listeners to laugh, relax, and hear a different side of their favorite hosts.

Expect twists, turns, and plenty of unexpected moments, as our veterans navigate the AI-powered chaos. You won’t want to miss the unscripted hilarity that ensues!

So grab a seat, sit back, and prepare for an unforgettable game night with the Common Veterans! Listen now to Season 2, Episode 11: Bunker Banter: The Common Veterans Game Night and experience the blend of camaraderie, comedy, and unpredictability that only AI and a group of veterans can deliver.

Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast and leave us a review—let us know if you think you handle the madness of game night in the bunker!

A Game Unlike Any OtherWhy This Episode Stands OutTune In and Join the Fun!

Daily Show Prep: Monday, Aug. 19

Daily : , . 19

1

Trump just dropped a new ad on X about Kamala’s price control plan and it is devastating

Yes, Kamala Harris and the Democrats Are Coming for Our Guns (WATCH)

Kamala finally took questions and it went exactly how you’d expect


Hour 2

McCormick unveils property tax plan

Braun/Beckwith campaign releases property tax relief plan

Rainwater property tax plan

Michigan teacher shortages alleviated, not student performance decline

Michigan School District Revenue and Expenditure Report


Hour 3

continues to ramble … but … was really good stuff.

Second Indiana City Forced to Drop ‘Dangerous’ Sanctuary Policy for Illegal Aliens

Fort Wayne Man Accepts 30-Year Sentence in Child Molestation Case

Possible human remains found at vacant Fort Wayne home

GARM Shutdown: The Impact of X and Rumble‘s Lawsuit on Digital Advertising

GARM : Impact of X and ‘s on Advertising

GARM Advertising Cartel Shuts Down Lawsuit: The Ripple Effect on Digital Advertising

The digital advertising landscape has seen significant upheavals, but none as sudden and dramatic as the recent shutdown of the Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) advertising cartel. The shutdown came just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, sending shockwaves through the industry. In this article, we will explore the implications of this shutdown, the potential reasons behind it, and it means for the future of digital advertising.

Understanding the GARM Advertising Cartel

What is GARM?

GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization formed by major advertisers, media agencies, and platforms to combat harmful content online and ensure brand safety. It aimed to create a safer digital environment by setting industry standards for and advertising practices.

The Role of GARM in Digital Advertising

GARM played a pivotal role in shaping the digital advertising landscape by promoting responsible media practices. It worked closely with social media platforms, advertisers, and agencies to ensure that advertisements did not appear alongside harmful or inappropriate content.

The Power of an Advertising Cartel

The concept of an advertising cartel is not new, but GARM’s influence was unprecedented. As a collective of some of the biggest names in the industry, GARM had the power to dictate terms to platforms and publishers, significantly influencing how content was moderated and how advertisements were placed.

The Lawsuit That Shook GARM

X and Rumble File a Lawsuit

In a surprising turn of events, social media platforms X and Rumble filed a lawsuit against GARM. The lawsuit alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws by unfairly limiting the advertising opportunities for certain platforms and creators.

Allegations of Bias and Censorship

The lawsuit brought to light accusations that GARM’s content moderation guidelines were biased and led to the censorship of certain viewpoints. X and Rumble argued that these practices were not only unfair but also stifled free and innovation in the digital space.

The Legal Grounds of the Lawsuit

The legal grounds for the lawsuit were rooted in antitrust laws, which are designed to prevent monopolistic practices and promote fair competition. X and Rumble argued that GARM’s practices amounted to a form of , where the biggest players in the industry conspired to control the market to their advantage.

The Immediate Aftermath

GARM’s Sudden Shutdown

Just 48 hours after the lawsuit was filed, GARM announced its shutdown. This abrupt decision left many in the industry stunned and raised questions about the organization’s internal workings and the strength of the allegations against it.

The Reactions from the Industry

The shutdown of GARM was met with a mix of reactions. Some industry players expressed relief, viewing GARM’s collapse as a victory for and fair competition. Others, however, were concerned about the vacuum left by GARM’s absence and what it mean for brand safety and content moderation moving forward.

Impact on Advertisers and Platforms

Advertisers and platforms are now facing a period of uncertainty. GARM’s standards and guidelines had provided a framework for ensuring that ads were placed in a safe environment. Without this framework, brands and platforms may struggle to navigate the complex and ever-changing digital landscape.

The Broader Implications

What Does This Mean for Brand Safety?

Brand safety has always been a top priority for advertisers, and GARM played a crucial role in maintaining it. With GARM gone, there are concerns that the standards for what constitutes a safe environment may become less consistent, leading to potential risks for brands.

The Future of Content Moderation

Content moderation is another area that could be significantly impacted by GARM’s shutdown. GARM’s guidelines were widely adopted by platforms, but without a centralized authority, there may be a lack of uniformity in how content is moderated across different platforms.

The Role of Government Regulation

In the wake of GARM’s shutdown, there is likely to be increased scrutiny from government regulators. There may be calls for stringent regulations to ensure that digital platforms maintain high standards of content moderation and brand safety without the influence of an advertising cartel.

The Potential for New Alliances

The Rise of New Industry Groups

The collapse of GARM could lead to the formation of new industry groups focused on responsible media practices. These new alliances may take a different approach, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in their guidelines and practices.

Opportunities for Smaller Platforms

The shutdown of GARM could also present new opportunities for smaller platforms. Without the dominance of a large cartel, smaller platforms may have a better chance to compete and attract advertisers who are looking for alternative options.

The Importance of Innovation

Innovation will be key in the post-GARM landscape. Platforms that can develop new and effective to ensure brand safety and content moderation without relying on a centralized authority will likely thrive in this new environment.

Conclusion

The shutdown of the GARM advertising cartel marks a significant moment in the history of digital advertising. While it brings challenges, particularly in terms of brand safety and content moderation, it also opens up new opportunities for innovation and fair competition. As the industry adapts to this new reality, it will be crucial for advertisers, platforms, and regulators to work together to create a digital environment that is both safe and competitive.

FAQs

What was GARM?

GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization that aimed to promote responsible media practices by setting standards for content moderation and advertising.

Why did GARM shut down?

GARM shut down just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, which alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws.

What are the implications of GARM’s shutdown?

The shutdown of GARM could lead to challenges in maintaining brand safety and consistent content moderation standards. It also presents new opportunities for smaller platforms and innovation in the industry.

How will this affect digital advertising?

The digital advertising landscape is likely to see increased uncertainty and competition. Advertisers and platforms may need to find new ways to ensure brand safety and navigate content moderation.

What can we expect in the future?

We can expect to see new industry groups forming, increased government regulation, and a greater emphasis on innovation in digital advertising practices.

Written By Wiretap

Migrant Buses At South Bend Social Security Office Causes Uproar

Migrant Buses At Office Causes Uproar

On Monday, July 29, I was tagged in several social media posts about two school buses dropping migrants off at the South Bend Social Security office. People had expressed that they couldn’t utilize the office’s services because of the number of people there.

The people off at the SSA building were all young men who appeared to be Mexican, Central, or South American. Most likely they were migrants. People asked that I look into it. I did.

Rep. Jim Banks, who’s also running for Senate in Indiana also shared a post about the buses in South Bend.

That particular post he responded to was removed, but others remain.

Vice Kamala Harris was routinely labeled as Biden’s ‘ czar’ by the . The Democrats and many in the media are trying to erase that historical fact.

South Bend Mayor James Mueller issued this statement to the South Bend Tribune:

“This was a group of lawful, documented residents at the social security office,” Mueller, a Democrat, said in a written statement. “Rep. Jim Banks is a shameful opportunist, spreading racist political lies instead of advancing real solutions for South Bend or our nation’s broken immigration system.”

Before he issued the statement, Mayor Mueller’s spokeswoman told the paper:

the mayor’s office learned enough about the situation to know that the people were at the Social Security office lawfully conducting business.

Given that migrants who have no legal standing to stay in the U.S. often get released into the country pending hearing, it’s certainly a concern that these might be illegal immigrants, or seekers who don’t qualify for asylum under the law. This is a common issue with the country’s border policies. Allowing migrants who crossed the border illegally to remain in the U.S. after being captured is a signature complaint about Biden’s border policy.

I contacted Mayor Mueller’s office since he didn’t answer people’s questions about the migrants at the SSA building to see if I get more information.

‘s what I sent him:

Screenshot Mail.federatedmedia.com 2024.07.30 18 31 07

After talking about the issue in my first segment on my radio show, Mayor Mueller’s office decided to send this response:

Screenshot 20240730 181004 Chrome

Rep. Jim Banks made no such assertions in his post. It was more ad hominem attacks from the Mayor’s office and the questions weren’t answered.

Finally, I was sent the response from the SSA about the migrant buses in South Bend from someone else who was working on this issue (I erased the of the recipient):

[unknown]

If the Mayor’s office hadn’t kept this all close to the vest and was just honest about what was happening, people might not have been as angry as they were. Instead, they chose to hurl false insults and attacks at people who were just trying to figure out what was going on.

Now all know the truth.

Daily Show Prep: July 30

Daily : July 30

1

Rep. Banks retweets about ‘illegals’ in South Bend. Mayor says they were lawful residents.

inquired of the from the buses.

This is response. They didn’t answer the .

Screenshot Mail.federatedmedia.com 2024.07.30 16 21 23

:

Judicial Watch Sues Pete Buttigieg’s City Administration for Records of ID Cards Created to Help Illegal Aliens

City, Regional Partnership, and Nonprofit Partners Launch South Bend Regional Welcoming Plan and New American Economic Impact Data

Tithe


Hour 2

Go Home Kam-Kam, You’re DRUNK: Transcript of Kamala Immigration/GOP Speech ACCIDENTALLY Hilarious

So ‘BUS-TED’! Kamala Harris ‘Wheel-y’ Bad Electric Bus Bet Wasted Billions of Dollars

Kamala Harris Has Promised to Ban Fracking but Now That’s Just a ‘Trump Accusation’

Disney World gets rid of drunken bear “Liver Lips McGrowl” because it’s racist and might offend alcoholics


Hour 3

Over 200 plant species to be renamed because they are [checks notes] racist

Troubling Incident at Kamala Harris PA Rally Raises Concerns About That Whole ‘Saving Democracy’ Thing

Embarrassing: MSNBC Contributor Faceplants After Trying to Hit JD Vance With a Wildly False Accusation

Gets Even WORSE for Kamala Harris: Dems Were Calling on KAMALA to Step Down Earlier This Year (Watch)

X took away the government “gray check” badge from Venezuela’s dictator after his election shenanigans