South Bend Police Recruiting Data. The Facts.

South Bend Police Recruiting Data. The Facts.

I told you on my show the Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the South Bend Police Department (and the city) for alleged violations of Title VII.

The reasons listed by the Biden/Harris administration are that the SBPD requires a physical and written exam to apply to become a police officer. The government says this is not necessary for the job’s duties. That’s obviously insane.

Here’s the SBPD’s response:

The City of South Bend will vigorously defend a lawsuit filed today by the Department of Justice, which accuses the Cityā€™s Police Department of unlawful hiring practices.

The City learned of the filing through the DOJā€™s press release and has not yet been formally served with the Complaint. Based on a preliminary review, the DOJ is not accusing the City of intentional discrimination. Instead, the lawsuit claims that the City Police Departmentā€™s hiring process and testing for new officers has had a disparate impact on female and African American applicants.

The City has consistently sought to build a diverse workforce, while it fulfills the requirements of state law, and makes sure that applicants can perform the job responsibilities of a South Bend police officer.

The South Bend Police Department believes its screening process fairly measures a candidateā€™s ability to perform the job. Like every other city in Indiana, South Bend must ensure its officers meet certain minimum criteria. Unlike every city in Indiana, South Bend allows every applicant multiple attempts at the physical examination per hiring cycle.

In its lawsuit, the DOJ accuses the SBPD of requiring a physical test that allegedly disproportionately screens women. However, the Cityā€™s requirements are consistent with the ILEA, the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (an agency created by Indiana law), which sets the minimum physical standards for police officers in Indiana.

The DOJā€™s lawsuit also attacks the SBPDā€™s written test, which is administered by an outside firm and is similar to written tests in other Indiana police departments, including the Indiana State Police. South Bend has regularly evaluated its written test to make sure it is fair and non-biased. Importantly, all SBPD applicants are invited to free tutoring sessions to prepare for the written test.

SBPD is confident that its standard applicant process results in high quality officers to protect and serve the City.

ā€œI am beyond disappointed that the DOJ has not been forthcoming with how these claims were determined in the first place,ā€ said South Bend Police Chief Scott Ruszkowski. ā€œOur hiring process, which includes females and African American applicants, has been consistent over the last ten years and led to an increasingly diverse department, especially over the past several years. We have even asked the outside testing company to modify the written test to open the process to more applicants. We are, and have been, very transparent and inclusive in our hiring process. All requirements are listed online and meet State mandates, and more importantly, meet what our community expects in a professional police officer.ā€

From 2017 to 2023, SBPD hired 15 female officers and 29 officers of color, accounting for 12.6% and 24.4% of all new officers, respectively. Currently, 9.9% of all officers are females and 11.5% of all officers are black ā€“ the highest percentage of black officers since at least 2012. Nationally, female officers make up 13.5% of local police departments and black officers make up 11.6%.[1]

The City, which has been cooperating with the DOJ during its investigation, believes the DOJā€™s lawsuit ignores the Cityā€™s obligations to comply with state law, will cause a delay in the Cityā€™s hiring processes, and amounts to a waste of taxpayer resources.

ā€œThe City is committed to recruiting a workforce that represents the community we serve, and the City is proud of the progress we have made over the past several years,ā€ said Mayor James Mueller. ā€œOur police department has worked diligently to increase the number of officers from underrepresented groups and to follow the letter and spirit of Indiana and federal law. Although the costs of this targeted litigation will be borne by federal and local taxpayers, the City will not voluntarily agree to federal control. We hope that common sense will prevail during the judicial process.ā€

[1] Local Police Departments Personnel, 2020. United States Department of Justice, November 2022.

City of South Bend

The City of South Bend gets a lot of things wrong. However, they have an awesome police data portal. This portal is accessible to everyone for free and covers recruitment data.

The chart above is for overall numbers.

The chart below is for SBPD recruiting based on ethnicity.

Nearly 65% of Black candidates passed the written test.

Nearly 85% of White candidates passed the written test.

This appears to be the source of the Biden/Harris administration’s ire.

77% of Black candidates passed the physical test.

White candidates passed with an 87% rate.

Black and White candidates were nearly equal in the percentage who made it past the background check to the polygraph, medical, and psych evaluations to be hired.

This simplified chart only compares Black, White, and all candidates:

South Bend police recruiting Black, White, and all candidates.

The Biden/Harris DOJ also alleges the physical test is sexist against women. Below is a chart for SBPD recruiting based on gender:

South Bend Police recruiting by gender 2017-2023.

Just under 54% of women candidates passed the physical test.

Just over 87% of men passed the physical test.

This is at the heart of the DOJ’s allegations.

Nearly 88% of women passed the written test.

Just under 80% of men passed the written test.

Notice the DOJ isn’t concerned with women outperforming men on the written requirement.

Women also performed better than men on the personal evaluation and the background check. All were ignored by the DOJ in this issue.

Men and women were also nearly equal in the percentage who made it past the background check to the polygraph, medical, and psych evaluations to be hired.

Various sources of data on these statistics fluctuate a couple of percentage points here and there. I used data mainly from the National Policing Institute. That’s why you will see some of my numbers differ slightly from the numbers released by South Bend.

Looking at the data, you can see that as long as a candidate can get past the required examinations, they stand roughly and equal chance of getting hired regardless of race or gender.

Furthermore, since 2017, the South Bend Police Department has hired more Black officers and Women officers than is the national average. Their total force is getting closer to national averages as a whole. This is line with my interview with SBPD Chief Scott Ruszkowski in August of 2017 where he highlighted the efforts to diversify the department after former mayor Pete Buttigieg became a national story and had an embarrassing campaign setback due to his stance on policing. Chief Ruszkowski assured my in 2017 that they were making efforts to diversify the department but that they weren’t going to jeopardize the department’s quality in doing so. Candidates needed to meet the requirements and standards.

The SBPD doesn’t even administer the tests the DOJ is suing them over. They are administered by a third party who works with over 100 agencies in multiple states.

The department has been using the same written test since 2012, and the physical testing is mandated by the state of Indiana, according to department sources. This has never been brought up before now.

In January 2021, Joe Biden chose Kristen Clarke to head the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. Suddenly, the SBPD is in the crosshairs.

Clarke has a history of race-obsessed left-wing activism and election denying. She has previously claimed that Blacks had “superior physical and mental abilities” to others. She also invited an antisemitic conspiracy theorist to be a guest speaker on campus at Harvard.

Clarke’s disturbing history of bigotry and left-wing zealotry is concerning enough. However, it’s her history of supporting the radical ‘defund the police’ movement that is most concerning.

Given Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s ties with the city of South Bend, his tattered relationship with the SBPD, and Kristen Clarke’s radicalism, one has to wonder if this might be personal against the SBPD. One also has to consider that the DOJ is advancing the ‘defund the police’ agenda with this lawsuit.

CHEAT SHEET

Key Takeaways from the Blog Post on South Bend Police Recruiting Data

  1. DOJ Lawsuit Against South Bend Police Department (SBPD)
    • The DOJ has sued SBPD and the City of South Bend, alleging discrimination in hiring practices under Title VII.
    • The lawsuit claims that the physical and written tests used by SBPD disproportionately impact female and Black applicants, despite SBPD arguing that these exams are essential to police duties.
  2. SBPDā€™s Defense and Response
    • The City of South Bend asserts that the tests comply with Indiana state law and are aligned with the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy’s standards.
    • SBPD emphasizes that applicants have multiple attempts to pass the physical exam during a hiring cycle and access to free tutoring sessions for the written test.
    • The department argues that the lawsuit ignores SBPD’s efforts to build a diverse police force and meet community expectations.
  3. Recruitment Data Analysis
    • Black candidates have a pass rate of 77% on the physical test, compared to 87% for White candidates.
    • The physical exam pass rate for women is lower at 54%, compared to 87% for men, which forms the core of the DOJ’s discrimination claim.
    • Women perform better than men on the written test (88% vs. 80%) and background evaluations, but the DOJ does not highlight these results in its lawsuit.
    • SBPD maintains that candidates who clear the required tests stand equal chances of hiring regardless of gender or race.
  4. Efforts Toward Diversity
    • From 2017-2023, SBPD hired 15 female officers (12.6%) and 29 officers of color (24.4%), bringing it closer to national averages for diversity in police departments.
    • SBPD Chief Scott Ruszkowski has reiterated efforts to diversify without compromising hiring standards.
  5. Political and Personal Factors in the Lawsuit
    • The blog suggests that the lawsuit may be influenced by political motives given South Bendā€™s connection to Pete Buttigieg, and the involvement of Kristen Clarke, head of the DOJ Civil Rights Division, who has a controversial history with race-related activism and police reform advocacy.
  6. Third-Party Test Administration
    • SBPD clarifies that the tests are administered by a third-party organization used by multiple agencies across states and have been in place since 2012 without previous legal challenges.
  7. Impact on City Resources
    • South Bend officials criticize the lawsuit as a waste of taxpayer resources and emphasize their commitment to following both state and federal law.

This summary highlights how the city believes its hiring practices are fair and compliant with legal standards while portraying the DOJā€™s lawsuit as politically motivated and harmful to local hiring efforts.

GARM Shutdown: The Impact of X and Rumble’s Lawsuit on Digital Advertising

GARM Shutdown: The Impact of X and Rumble’s Lawsuit on Digital Advertising

GARM Advertising Cartel Shuts Down After Lawsuit: The Ripple Effect on Digital Advertising

The digital advertising landscape has seen significant upheavals, but none as sudden and dramatic as the recent shutdown of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) advertising cartel. The shutdown came just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, sending shockwaves through the industry. In this article, we will explore the implications of this shutdown, the potential reasons behind it, and what it means for the future of digital advertising.

Understanding the GARM Advertising Cartel

What is GARM?

GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization formed by major advertisers, media agencies, and platforms to combat harmful content online and ensure brand safety. It aimed to create a safer digital environment by setting industry standards for content moderation and advertising practices.

The Role of GARM in Digital Advertising

GARM played a pivotal role in shaping the digital advertising landscape by promoting responsible media practices. It worked closely with social media platforms, advertisers, and agencies to ensure that advertisements did not appear alongside harmful or inappropriate content.

The Power of an Advertising Cartel

The concept of an advertising cartel is not new, but GARM’s influence was unprecedented. As a collective of some of the biggest names in the industry, GARM had the power to dictate terms to platforms and publishers, significantly influencing how content was moderated and how advertisements were placed.

The Lawsuit That Shook GARM

X and Rumble File a Lawsuit

In a surprising turn of events, social media platforms X and Rumble filed a lawsuit against GARM. The lawsuit alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws by unfairly limiting the advertising opportunities for certain platforms and creators.

Allegations of Bias and Censorship

The lawsuit brought to light accusations that GARM’s content moderation guidelines were biased and led to the censorship of certain viewpoints. X and Rumble argued that these practices were not only unfair but also stifled free speech and innovation in the digital space.

The Legal Grounds of the Lawsuit

The legal grounds for the lawsuit were rooted in antitrust laws, which are designed to prevent monopolistic practices and promote fair competition. X and Rumble argued that GARM’s practices amounted to a form of collusion, where the biggest players in the industry conspired to control the market to their advantage.

The Immediate Aftermath

GARM’s Sudden Shutdown

Just 48 hours after the lawsuit was filed, GARM announced its shutdown. This abrupt decision left many in the industry stunned and raised questions about the organization’s internal workings and the strength of the allegations against it.

The Reactions from the Industry

The shutdown of GARM was met with a mix of reactions. Some industry players expressed relief, viewing GARM’s collapse as a victory for free speech and fair competition. Others, however, were concerned about the vacuum left by GARM’s absence and what it could mean for brand safety and content moderation moving forward.

Impact on Advertisers and Platforms

Advertisers and platforms are now facing a period of uncertainty. GARM’s standards and guidelines had provided a framework for ensuring that ads were placed in a safe environment. Without this framework, brands and platforms may struggle to navigate the complex and ever-changing digital landscape.

The Broader Implications

What Does This Mean for Brand Safety?

Brand safety has always been a top priority for advertisers, and GARM played a crucial role in maintaining it. With GARM gone, there are concerns that the standards for what constitutes a safe environment may become less consistent, leading to potential risks for brands.

The Future of Content Moderation

Content moderation is another area that could be significantly impacted by GARM’s shutdown. GARM’s guidelines were widely adopted by platforms, but without a centralized authority, there may be a lack of uniformity in how content is moderated across different platforms.

The Role of Government Regulation

In the wake of GARM’s shutdown, there is likely to be increased scrutiny from government regulators. There may be calls for more stringent regulations to ensure that digital platforms maintain high standards of content moderation and brand safety without the influence of an advertising cartel.

The Potential for New Alliances

The Rise of New Industry Groups

The collapse of GARM could lead to the formation of new industry groups focused on responsible media practices. These new alliances may take a different approach, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in their guidelines and practices.

Opportunities for Smaller Platforms

The shutdown of GARM could also present new opportunities for smaller platforms. Without the dominance of a large cartel, smaller platforms may have a better chance to compete and attract advertisers who are looking for alternative options.

The Importance of Innovation

Innovation will be key in the post-GARM landscape. Platforms that can develop new and effective ways to ensure brand safety and content moderation without relying on a centralized authority will likely thrive in this new environment.

Conclusion

The shutdown of the GARM advertising cartel marks a significant moment in the history of digital advertising. While it brings challenges, particularly in terms of brand safety and content moderation, it also opens up new opportunities for innovation and fair competition. As the industry adapts to this new reality, it will be crucial for advertisers, platforms, and regulators to work together to create a digital environment that is both safe and competitive.

FAQs

What was GARM?

GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization that aimed to promote responsible media practices by setting standards for content moderation and advertising.

Why did GARM shut down?

GARM shut down just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, which alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws.

What are the implications of GARM’s shutdown?

The shutdown of GARM could lead to challenges in maintaining brand safety and consistent content moderation standards. It also presents new opportunities for smaller platforms and innovation in the industry.

How will this affect digital advertising?

The digital advertising landscape is likely to see increased uncertainty and competition. Advertisers and platforms may need to find new ways to ensure brand safety and navigate content moderation.

What can we expect in the future?

We can expect to see new industry groups forming, increased government regulation, and a greater emphasis on innovation in digital advertising practices.

Written By Wiretap

Hour 1

Watch this girl absolutely melt after she’s snubbed by President Biden

Biden’s big interview did NOT go well, and we have all the lowlights

Joe Biden Takes Jab At Donald Trump: “I’ll Beat Him Again In 2020” šŸ„“

Biden Incoherently Attempts to Make His Case to Stay in the Race on Morning Joe

Brace for Incoherent Venting! An Angry President Biden Called MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ and YIKES

Biden tells Democrats in Congress he’s staying in presidential race

‘Look Who’s Joining the Party’! NYT Decided It Was Time to Report Who Repeatedly Visited the WH

Trump offers ā€˜Sleepy Joeā€™ sage campaign advice amid calls to step aside ā€“ urges Biden to ā€˜ignore criticsā€™


Hour 2

John Rust petitions U.S. Supreme Court to evaluate Indianaā€™s party affiliation statute

Teachers’ Union President Gives Best Homeschooling Advertisement Of All Time

Walmart facing class-action lawsuit over ā€˜deceptive and unfair pricing practicesā€™

House Dems launch united effort against election bill requiring voters prove citizenship

10% of illegal aliens admit they’re registered to vote: Heritage Foundation survey


Hour 3

Interview: Tim Cotton

ACLU to seek prisoner release without ā€œdramatic turnaroundā€ in Allen County Jail population

Leaked notes show Biden gets detailed instructions on how to walk to podiums. Check out the reactions šŸ˜­

Doug Chaffee Responds To Real News Michiana Article About Him

Doug Chaffee Responds To Real News Michiana Article About Him

On June 26, 2024, Real News Michiana published an article about Doug Chaffee. Doug Chaffee is the former Principal of Penn High School and is currently running for PHM school board. Doug Chaffee is also the father of current PHM school board member Matt Chaffee. RNM recently published an article about Matt Chaffee as well.

In the article about Doug Chaffee, RNM claimed that Doug Chaffee engaged in a “terrifying attack” against Matt Chaffee’s girlfriend at the time.

Doug Chaffee reached out to me asking if I’d be willing to publish his response. He expressed that he felt I was the only media outlet that would be fair to him and publish his response without taking sides.

Here’s Doug Chaffee’s statement on the Real News Michiana article about him:

Clifton French of RNM has taken our conversation from September of 2023 out of context. He has not provided the full text messages between us, and he has completely twisted my words to him to create a ā€œhit pieceā€ on myself and my son. I am guessing Mr. French has not released the full audio recording he claims to have due to threats he made about killing his ex-wife and others on that same call. My son and I are no longer going to entertain these defamatory articles as our focus is serving the PHM community and its constituents. Thank you to everyone who supported and continues to support the Chaffee family in our endeavors to better our community.

– Doug Chaffee

I can not verify the claims made by Doug Chaffee, but I’m told his attorneys approved the release to me. I’m also told there’s more to come in future releases.

Daily Show Prep: Wednesday, June 26

Daily Show Prep: Wednesday, June 26

Hour 1

FLASHBACK:

Color Me Shocked: Special Counsel Admits to FBI Tampering of Mar-a-Lago Documents

Rep. Lauren Boebert wins GOP primary after switching Colorado districts; Hurd, Crank also notch wins

Fire-alarm lover Jamaal Bowman lost his expensive primary last night and seemed a bit ā€¦ unstable during his concession speech

Supreme Court tosses case that would prevent government from coercing social media to censor people. Check out Alito’s outraged dissent.


Hour 2

VIDEO: We now have living robot skin that can smile. Let the nightmares begin!

Rep. Banks tells Speaker Johnson House GOP should support Bannon legal defense

WaPo says “we’ve been accidentally cooling the planet ā€¦ while warming it” ā€¦ I’ve done my best to translate the clown speak for ya šŸ„“

Saying “good morning” is racist now, according to this woman


Hour 3

WikiLeaksā€™ Assange pleads guilty to publishing US military secrets in deal that secures his freedom

FLASHBACK:

Julian Assange ‘phoned the White House to warn of risk to lives’ over Wikileaks release

He added: “You can accurately describe this chapter of the case as lies, lies and more lies.”

Mr Summers said WikiLeaks had begun redacting 250,000 leaked documents in November 2010, working with media partners around the world.

He added: “That process involved the US government and state department feeding suggested redactions to the media.

“Knowing the US government was involved in the redaction process, can it be in any way said the request represents a fair or accurate representation of what occurred?”

Mr Summers blamed the leaks on a 2011 book from The Guardian newspaper about WikiLeaks, which contained a 58-key password.

18 revelations from Wikileaks’ hacked Clinton emails