Why Current Headlines Show Just How Polarizing Today’s News Landscape Has Become
The news cycle is moving fast, and with so much happening, it’s clear that certain topics are grabbing people’s attention and exposing deep divides in public opinion. Whether it’s issues affecting seniors, discussions around the U.S. economy, controversies around candidates, or surprising shifts in policies from big-name companies like Ford, these headlines illustrate the complexities Americans are navigating in today’s world. This article breaks down the topics covered across three “hours” of the news cycle, with each focusing on timely, controversial, and eye-opening developments.
Hour 1: The Economy, Voter Turnout, and Voting Controversies
Tom Cotton’s ‘Hall of Fame Tweet’ Highlights Biden-Harris Economy’s Impact on Seniors
Senator Tom Cotton shared photos on social media that purportedly show the financial strain facing seniors under the Biden-Harris administration. This tweet has quickly gone viral, with many Americans echoing his concerns about inflation, high costs of healthcare, and shrinking retirement savings. Cotton’s message resonates with countless seniors and younger voters worried about how today’s economy will impact future stability.
Harris Hosts Concert in Milwaukee with Popular Musicians
Vice President Kamala Harris recently announced a concert event in Milwaukee featuring a lineup of popular artists. Aimed at boosting her appeal among younger voters, the event showcases the administration’s focus on cultural outreach, particularly as the 2024 election season approaches. However, critics argue that a concert won’t be enough to sway voters facing economic challenges and pressing policy questions.
Early Voting Numbers: High Turnout, But Who Will Benefit?
Recent reports show that early voting turnout is reaching record levels, but it’s unclear which candidate will benefit the most from this surge. Early voting data is often a telltale sign of voter enthusiasm, though it doesn’t always predict final outcomes. Analysts suggest that higher turnout typically favors progressive candidates, but with the political climate as polarized as it is, both sides remain hopeful.
Chinese Student Faces Charges for Voting in Michigan
In a surprising twist, a Chinese international student is facing criminal charges for allegedly voting illegally in Michigan. The state currently has no system to track or reject the student’s vote due to its counting policies. This situation has reignited debates around voter ID laws and voting security, with many pointing to this case as evidence of flaws in the current system.
Hour 2: Ford’s EV Decision, Bill Clinton on the Economy, and Canadian Euthanasia Debates
Ford Pauses Electric F-150 Production Due to Sluggish EV Sales
Ford has recently paused production of its popular electric F-150 truck amid declining EV sales in the U.S. market. The decision reflects the challenges facing the EV industry, with high upfront costs, charging infrastructure concerns, and waning consumer interest all contributing to Ford’s temporary halt in production.
Ford CEO Faces Criticism for Driving Chinese-Made EV
Adding fuel to the fire, Ford’s CEO has received backlash for driving a Chinese-manufactured EV instead of an American model. Critics claim that supporting foreign-made vehicles, particularly from China, undermines U.S. manufacturing and job creation, sparking further controversy in an already competitive market.
Chicago Shooting Suspect is a Catch-and-Release Migrant
A recent report revealed that the suspect involved in a Chicago shooting incident is a migrant with a history of being released by immigration authorities. This tragic incident has reignited debates on the country’s immigration policies, with some advocating for stricter enforcement, while others warn against generalizing incidents to broader immigration issues.
Bill Clinton in Michigan: Economy ‘Better’ Under Trump
Former President Bill Clinton recently stated at a Michigan rally that the economy was “better” under Donald Trump. However, he encouraged voters to support Kamala Harris, arguing that her policies will lead to long-term stability. Clinton’s comment has drawn mixed reactions, with some applauding his candor, while others see it as a slight against the Biden administration’s economic performance.
Kimmel Spreads Disinformation, Meme Creator Sent to Prison
Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel has come under fire for allegedly spreading disinformation to viewers, drawing parallels to a recent court case in which a meme creator was sentenced to prison for election-related disinformation. This juxtaposition has stirred debate about free speech, media responsibility, and whether all individuals are equally accountable for misinformation.
Canadian Doctors Express Regret Over Euthanasia Decisions
Several Canadian doctors have expressed regret over assisting euthanasia cases involving patients who were impoverished, obese, or suffering from depression. As Canada’s euthanasia laws continue to expand, this issue has stirred a heated debate about the ethics of assisted death, with some calling for more restrictions to prevent further regretful cases.
Hour 3: Rep. Jim Banks, Trump’s Garbage Truck Stunt, and Media Reactions
Rep. Jim Banks Discusses Senate Campaign and New Bill
Indiana Congressman Jim Banks recently spoke about his campaign for the U.S. Senate, where he aims to bring conservative values and change to Washington. Banks also discussed his proposed End Executive Branch Amnesty Act, designed to limit executive overreach on immigration policies. His platform resonates with those seeking stricter immigration controls and a more balanced power structure in government.
Trump’s Garbage Truck Stunt Draws Mixed Reactions
Former President Trump made headlines with a new stunt involving a garbage truck. This move quickly became a point of debate, with some praising Trump’s ability to capture media attention, while others criticized it as an unorthodox approach that detracts from serious campaign issues. The media’s polarized reactions underscore the intense scrutiny Trump continues to face.
CBS Anchor Criticizes Trump Stunt, Community Notes Fact-Check NYT Columnist
A CBS anchor openly criticized Trump’s recent garbage truck stunt, expressing concern that it was distracting from the issues that matter most. Additionally, Community Notes flagged a New York Times columnist’s story on a Nevada miscarriage case, pointing out that key details were omitted, leading to a misleading narrative. These incidents highlight the ongoing tensions between conservative media and mainstream news outlets.
Politico Journalist Misidentifies a Garbage Truck as a Dump Truck
In an amusing twist, a Politico journalist recently misidentified a garbage truck as a dump truck while covering Trump’s stunt. This minor error quickly went viral, with conservatives using it as an example of perceived media incompetence when reporting on Trump-related stories.
Media’s Fear of Trump Victory Intensifies
As the election draws nearer, some media figures are openly voicing concerns over the prospect of a Trump victory, warning that it could threaten the future of journalism. MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace recently remarked that the stakes of this election could be “life or death” for women, fueling further partisan debates.
Morning Joe Meltdown as Election Approaches
MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” has reportedly reached a fever pitch with each day drawing closer to the election. With the show hosts increasingly vocal and emotional about a potential Trump victory, the program offers insight into the heightened emotions and partisan sentiments that define today’s news cycle.
Casey Hendrickson on Election Intimidation
Radio host Casey Hendrickson has also weighed in, responding to a progressive professor who allegedly attempted to discourage voters from supporting Trump. Hendrickson’s take underscores the deep divides in American discourse, with both sides feeling emboldened and concerned about voter intimidation.
Conclusion
Today’s news cycle illustrates just how polarized society has become on issues like the economy, immigration, healthcare, and media influence. From controversial stances taken by political figures to the intense scrutiny each receives, it’s clear that the upcoming election season will only magnify these divisions. As voters and consumers of news, it’s essential to stay informed and critically evaluate each narrative.
FAQs
1. What was the purpose of Trump’s garbage truck stunt? Trump’s garbage truck stunt appears to have been a tactic to capture media attention, though opinions on its effectiveness are divided.
2. Why did Ford pause production on its electric F-150? Ford temporarily halted production due to declining sales and consumer interest in EVs, possibly reflecting broader hesitancy toward electric vehicles.
3. What are Community Notes, and how do they affect news credibility? Community Notes is a fact-checking initiative on platforms like X, aiming to highlight misleading information and provide additional context for readers.
4. Why is Bill Clinton supporting Kamala Harris? While he acknowledged Trump’s economic performance, Clinton supports Harris, suggesting her policies may offer greater long-term benefits.
5. What is the End Executive Branch Amnesty Act proposed by Jim Banks? This bill aims to limit executive authority on immigration policies, reinforcing Congress’s role in such decisions.
The latest Daily Show Prep: Thursday, Oct. 24 dives deep into the recent media frenzy with a focus on debunking yet another Trump hit piece. This time, the Atlantic tried to smear Donald Trump with a false narrative about his military stance. But thanks to insider accounts, including those from former officials, the story has been thoroughly debunked. Even Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff stepped in to call out the falsehoods surrounding General Kelly’s statements. This breakdown offers a clear view of how the media continues to push these hit pieces without verifying facts. (Designed by AIPRM).
Pence’s Chief of Staff Debunks Trump Military Story
A key piece of evidence in this Trump hit piece debunked story comes from Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff. He publicly refuted General Kelly’s claims, stating outright that the narrative pushed by the Atlantic is entirely fabricated. In a world where fact-checking seems to be optional, it’s refreshing to see high-level officials standing up for the truth. The media’s role in spreading unverified information about Trump’s stance on the military has been under fire, and this new evidence only adds to the pressure.
9 in 10 Voters Demand Kamala Harris Transcript
Alongside the Trump hit piece debunked, the spotlight is also on CBS and its recent interview with Kamala Harris. Polls indicate that 9 out of 10 voters want the full transcript of her interview released. Trump is even considering suing CBS if the network refuses to release the entire interview. This comes after the FCC Commissioner hinted at a potential probe into CBS over the distortions made during the interview. The constant media manipulations, from Trump to Harris, are becoming clearer by the day.
Trump to Sue CBS Over Interview Manipulation?
Another important revelation in Trump hit piece debunked is Trump’s potential lawsuit against CBS. The network is accused of distorting his interview with Kamala Harris, leaving out key details that could swing public opinion. Trump is no stranger to legal battles, and this time he’s taking aim at media giants who continue to mislead the public. It’s a battle over transparency, and Trump isn’t backing down without a fight.
Harris Struggles with Word Salad Once Again
In a now-infamous CNN Town Hall, Kamala Harris fell into what many are calling “Word Salad City.” This latest blunder has only fueled public frustration. Paired with Liz Cheney’s dwindling political capital, the political landscape continues to shift. The Trump hit piece debunked reminds readers that the media isn’t just failing on Trump’s front, but also on accurately portraying Harris’ repeated stumbles during key moments.
MSNBC Fails to Push Racism Narrative with Black Voters
The Trump hit piece debunked post also highlights MSNBC’s failed attempt to stir the pot with Black women voters. The network’s push to frame certain issues as race-related didn’t resonate with the very group they were targeting. Voters are becoming increasingly savvy to media manipulation, and this recent failure only cements that notion. The lack of traction for these narratives showcases a growing demand for authentic reporting rather than manufactured outrage.
Veteran Kicked Off Delta Flight Sparks Outrage
Rounding off the Trump hit piece debunked, a story that is grabbing headlines involves a veteran who was kicked off a Delta flight for wearing a shirt advocating for suicide awareness among veterans. This incident has caused public outrage, raising questions about corporate policies and the treatment of those who have served. It’s yet another example of how social issues are intertwined with media narratives and how public opinion is often shaped by incomplete stories.
In conclusion, the latest issue of Daily Show Prep on Thursday, Oct. 24, effectively dismantles the recent media frenzy surrounding another Trump hit piece. By examining the facts and providing clarity, the show reinforces the importance of critical thinking in today’s media landscape. For those seeking to stay informed and engaged, be sure to follow my social media accounts for updates, insights, and more discussions on the pressing issues of our time. Join the conversation and empower yourself with the truth.
GARM Advertising Cartel Shuts Down After Lawsuit: The Ripple Effect on Digital Advertising
The digital advertising landscape has seen significant upheavals, but none as sudden and dramatic as the recent shutdown of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) advertising cartel. The shutdown came just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, sending shockwaves through the industry. In this article, we will explore the implications of this shutdown, the potential reasons behind it, and what it means for the future of digital advertising.
Understanding the GARM Advertising Cartel
What is GARM?
GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization formed by major advertisers, media agencies, and platforms to combat harmful content online and ensure brand safety. It aimed to create a safer digital environment by setting industry standards for content moderation and advertising practices.
The Role of GARM in Digital Advertising
GARM played a pivotal role in shaping the digital advertising landscape by promoting responsible media practices. It worked closely with social media platforms, advertisers, and agencies to ensure that advertisements did not appear alongside harmful or inappropriate content.
The Power of an Advertising Cartel
The concept of an advertising cartel is not new, but GARM’s influence was unprecedented. As a collective of some of the biggest names in the industry, GARM had the power to dictate terms to platforms and publishers, significantly influencing how content was moderated and how advertisements were placed.
The Lawsuit That Shook GARM
X and Rumble File a Lawsuit
In a surprising turn of events, social media platforms X and Rumble filed a lawsuit against GARM. The lawsuit alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws by unfairly limiting the advertising opportunities for certain platforms and creators.
Allegations of Bias and Censorship
The lawsuit brought to light accusations that GARM’s content moderation guidelines were biased and led to the censorship of certain viewpoints. X and Rumble argued that these practices were not only unfair but also stifled free speech and innovation in the digital space.
The Legal Grounds of the Lawsuit
The legal grounds for the lawsuit were rooted in antitrust laws, which are designed to prevent monopolistic practices and promote fair competition. X and Rumble argued that GARM’s practices amounted to a form of collusion, where the biggest players in the industry conspired to control the market to their advantage.
The Immediate Aftermath
GARM’s Sudden Shutdown
Just 48 hours after the lawsuit was filed, GARM announced its shutdown. This abrupt decision left many in the industry stunned and raised questions about the organization’s internal workings and the strength of the allegations against it.
The Reactions from the Industry
The shutdown of GARM was met with a mix of reactions. Some industry players expressed relief, viewing GARM’s collapse as a victory for free speech and fair competition. Others, however, were concerned about the vacuum left by GARM’s absence and what it could mean for brand safety and content moderation moving forward.
Impact on Advertisers and Platforms
Advertisers and platforms are now facing a period of uncertainty. GARM’s standards and guidelines had provided a framework for ensuring that ads were placed in a safe environment. Without this framework, brands and platforms may struggle to navigate the complex and ever-changing digital landscape.
The Broader Implications
What Does This Mean for Brand Safety?
Brand safety has always been a top priority for advertisers, and GARM played a crucial role in maintaining it. With GARM gone, there are concerns that the standards for what constitutes a safe environment may become less consistent, leading to potential risks for brands.
The Future of Content Moderation
Content moderation is another area that could be significantly impacted by GARM’s shutdown. GARM’s guidelines were widely adopted by platforms, but without a centralized authority, there may be a lack of uniformity in how content is moderated across different platforms.
The Role of Government Regulation
In the wake of GARM’s shutdown, there is likely to be increased scrutiny from government regulators. There may be calls for more stringent regulations to ensure that digital platforms maintain high standards of content moderation and brand safety without the influence of an advertising cartel.
The Potential for New Alliances
The Rise of New Industry Groups
The collapse of GARM could lead to the formation of new industry groups focused on responsible media practices. These new alliances may take a different approach, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in their guidelines and practices.
Opportunities for Smaller Platforms
The shutdown of GARM could also present new opportunities for smaller platforms. Without the dominance of a large cartel, smaller platforms may have a better chance to compete and attract advertisers who are looking for alternative options.
The Importance of Innovation
Innovation will be key in the post-GARM landscape. Platforms that can develop new and effective ways to ensure brand safety and content moderation without relying on a centralized authority will likely thrive in this new environment.
Conclusion
The shutdown of the GARM advertising cartel marks a significant moment in the history of digital advertising. While it brings challenges, particularly in terms of brand safety and content moderation, it also opens up new opportunities for innovation and fair competition. As the industry adapts to this new reality, it will be crucial for advertisers, platforms, and regulators to work together to create a digital environment that is both safe and competitive.
FAQs
What was GARM?
GARM, or the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was an organization that aimed to promote responsible media practices by setting standards for content moderation and advertising.
Why did GARM shut down?
GARM shut down just 48 hours after a lawsuit was filed by X and Rumble, which alleged that GARM’s practices were anti-competitive and violated antitrust laws.
What are the implications of GARM’s shutdown?
The shutdown of GARM could lead to challenges in maintaining brand safety and consistent content moderation standards. It also presents new opportunities for smaller platforms and innovation in the industry.
How will this affect digital advertising?
The digital advertising landscape is likely to see increased uncertainty and competition. Advertisers and platforms may need to find new ways to ensure brand safety and navigate content moderation.
What can we expect in the future?
We can expect to see new industry groups forming, increased government regulation, and a greater emphasis on innovation in digital advertising practices.
My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.
This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery:
We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup.
These claims sound like fantastical conspiracy theory, but they are not. They are proof of conspiracy. If you investigate this mountain of research, you will prove them too. If you learn a great deal about Ponzi schemes, you will discover that our life is a lie. If you follow this story and the links below, you will discover the rotten truth of ‘post-truth America’. You will learn the scariest and stupidest story in world history. And you will realize that we are all in a desperate state of emergency that requires your action.
To my friends and family, witnesses and first responders, I deeply apologize for inflicting this pain upon you. But I assure you it is a drop in the bucket compared to what our government intends to inflict.
Because these words are true, this is an act of revolution.
—
Last March, a billionaire named Peter Thiel started a bank run on Silicon Valley Bank. I knew enough about Thiel that I found this incredibly suspicious: My hunch was that this was intentional, though I couldn’t fathom why.
I began investigating online, and quickly found cryptocurrency’s fingerprints all over it. The bank run occurred just days after Silvergate Bank – which catered almost exclusively to crypto companies – collapsed. Meanwhile, several crypto cheerleaders were all over financial media warning of a regional banking crisis, and nobody in media was addressing the clear crypto connections.
I dug deep into the financials of Thiel’s venture capital firm Founders Fund and eventually uncovered the following, all proven many times over.
Cryptocurrency is our first planetary multi-trillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. It was expressly created for this purpose by a laundry list of rich and powerful people out of Stanford/Silicon Valley and Harvard/Facebook.
The March 2023 bank failures were all intentional: the banks were used to move out stolen Ponzi money. This signals that they’re no longer dumping cash in to keep the cryptocurrency Ponzi afloat, and that it will soon go insolvent, as all Ponzis must.
When the Ponzi scheme goes insolvent, it will take down half the stock market with it: The perpetrators used their major companies to pipe into the blockchain so they could funnel money out from the crypto exchanges. This includes Google, Tesla, Apple, PayPal, Facebook, Disney, Walmart, Target, InBev, Zoom, and countless others.
It is a Ponzi scheme so large that it created global inflation, which is why the price of Bitcoin has been a remarkable leading indicator for inflation rates. Victims who bought crypto don’t realize their money has already been stolen, so the money gets double-counted by the victims and the criminals who stole it.
As it turns out, our elites are awash in Ponzi schemes. Stanford’s StartX.com investment fund and Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Program for Evolutionary Dynamics’ he ran at Harvard are both fake-science Ponzi factories that these schools have invested billions in: They are filled with fraudulent companies that use smoke and mirrors to promise miraculous new technology, but always collapse while the perpetrators only get richer.
Funneling trillions of dollars in stolen cash through the stock market created the largest stock-market anomaly in history. The stock chart signature of a Ponzi scheme is a massive increase (while they stack up cash) and then a massive fall (as they funnel out the stolen cash). This chart shape appeared in all the companies listed above. In order to explain the massive anomaly, our criminal government unleashed COVID on the world and told us these were the “stay at home stocks.”
—
Ponzi schemes are vicious beasts, and cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi by orders of magnitude. It could best be described as an economic doomsday device, intentionally made to shatter the world economy.
The U.S. government is fully involved in this totalitarian con: To illustrate its bipartisan support, I’ll note that nearly every participant of the Clinton Global Initiative has ties to cryptocurrency, while two of the biggest tech VCs who participated are Trump associates Josh Kushner and Anthony Scaramucci.
To better understand our form of government, I will point you to one of the most astonishing pieces of stand-alone evidence I’ve found: Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton’s 1988 DNC speech where he nominated Mike Dukakis for president against George H.W. Bush. The speech is a vile, mean-spirited roast of Dukakis that makes no sense whatsoever: For Clinton to ruthlessly attack a member of his own party should have been political suicide, and he repeatedly mocks Dukakis’ noble and earnest qualities.
Notably, actor Rob Lowe, who was supporting Dukakis, was victim of a teen sex blackmail operation at the DNC that year. Since we know Clinton is a close associate with teen sex blackmail artist Jeffrey Epstein, we can suddenly make perfect sense of the nonsensical speech by applying this lens: Bill Clinton is a cocky mob boss who blackmailed Mike Dukakis because Dukakis thought his job was to help the public. He teases out the future public revelation that Kitty Dukakis drank rubbing alcohol, and offers a strange anecdote about the crack epidemic that reveals he is an exceedingly proud drug runner.
What does this revelation tell us? That our government is conning us completely. That Bill Clinton was secretly on (former CIA Director) George H.W. Bush’s side, and that the Democrat vs. Republican division has been entirely manufactured ever since: Clinton is with Bush; Gore is with Bush; Trump is with Hillary, and so on. When they present themselves in public, they are acting as characters that are against one another, practicing kayfabe as wrestlers do.
As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.
Since it is fully parasitic, a secret kleptocracy is an incredibly unstable form of government – left to its own devices, it can only lead to fascism or failed state.
—
One of the key findings of this research is that Harvard University is one of the largest organized crime fronts in history, which is how they churn out billionaires – it’s a major hub of this sprawling criminal network.
As it turns out, dozens of the writers of The Simpsons went to Harvard. So I asked myself the question: If The Simpsons served the interests of organized crime, how would it do so?
Well, it offers a dysfunctional family suffering from moral decay, a community incapable of solving its problems, a worker drone who slaves away for an evil billionaire, and cathartic laughs for our poor collective circumstances.
There are some notable specifics as it relates to this research, too: In Marge vs. The Monorail, the townsfolk are too oafish and divided to invest in the town’s needs (fix Main Street) and fall for the charms of a dazzling showman with a bogus monorail Ponzi scheme. When we know that the show is closely linked to an organization that invests billions of dollars in Ponzi factories, this becomes quite damning.
In Lisa the Iconoclast, Lisa discovers that town founder Jebediah Springfield was a secret criminal con artist, and that the townsfolk’s lives are a lie. Realizing this is an important discovery, she desperately tries to get the townsfolk to listen to her. But they meet her with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship and she fails to get through to them. Ultimately, she realizes the town is so far gone that perhaps it’s better for them to be lied to by con artists, and she keeps the secret to herself.
And here I’ve been, like Lisa Simpson, desperately trying to get friends, family, and the public to believe the proof of a totalitarian con I’m trying to show them, and they’ve turned away with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship.
And so, we realize the criminal truth of The Simpsons: Our elites are telling us that our eroding collective circumstances are our own fault, and we can’t do anything about it, while they steal the American Dream from us. It is, for lack of a more elegant word, brainwashing.
—
Lastly, we string these major discoveries together: Cryptocurrency is an economic doomsday device; our government is a secret kleptocracy; The Simpsons exists to brainwash us. From there, the only research we need is critical thinking and we’re able to piece together the true story of our circumstances.
Consider America since 1988: Institutions like healthcare and universities have become parasitic in their skyrocketing prices. News media tells us to be angry and tribalized. Daytime television warns us of moral decay. Local news tell us to fear our neighbors. The Simpsons tells us we’re too oafish and divided to save the American Dream. Seinfeld tells us to celebrate the assholes and be irritated by all the normal people around us. “Reality” TV tells us that real life is filled with hedonism and strife.
Social media, owned by crypto criminals like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, is flooded with nonsense conspiracy theories and memes reminding us that we are hopeless, helpless, anxious, depressed, ironic, scared, apathetic, escapist, lonely, misguided, and jaded, telling us we can’t do anything but have a laugh at our circumstances.
Liberals mock the hypocrisy of conservatives; conservatives mock the hypocrisy of liberals, and our collective circumstances erode. The left shouts “All Cops Are Bastards,” which ensures they’ll be hated by the police and the public (and flies in the face of leftist theory). The public’s distrust of the government is at an all-time high, but so is the belief that we are helpless to do anything about it.
And with all this, a sharp rise in apocalyptic messaging: Climate change will kill us all; COVID will kill us all; vaccines will kill us all; AI will kill us all – no matter the bubbles we ascribe to, we’re bombarded with existential crises with no solutions. We’ve seen a surge in apocalyptic film, literature, and video games that tell us there is no way out of our poor circumstances but total societal breakdown. Zombies tell us that the public is our enemy. If you go to your nearest convenience store, you can buy a can of water called “Liquid Death.”
This is our rotten farce: For our entire lives, we have been flooded with media designed to slowly steer us into a world where the American Dream was dead, where the public was fully divided against itself, where everybody believed we were powerless to do anything about our worsening circumstances. It is all so they can organize an unprecedented, apocalyptic rug pull on the entire populace as they pivot to fascism, which is perhaps best understood as kleptocracy at the barrel of a gun.
When we piece it all together, we understand the truth: We are in a totalitarian doomsday cult.
Why on earth would our elites do this? There are many reasons, but the simplest is because capitalism is unsustainable, and they knew it: Climate change and resource extraction would catch up eventually. So, they never intended to sustain it. They knew all along that they would gobble up all the wealth they could, and then yank the rug out from under us so they could pivot to a hellish fascist dystopia.
—
Things escalated wildly in 1988 when former CIA Director George H.W. Bush got the White House, but this plan had been in action long prior:
Why is Stanley Kubrick’s comedy about mutually assured destruction called Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? Because he was a cocky secret fascist who was getting us to stop worrying and love the bomb. Why did he make A Clockwork Orange? So we’d rejoice at ultra-violence designed to desensitize us to the horrors of the world.
Why were the Manson Family murders crawling with cover-ups and intelligence agents? Because our government wanted to make us fear for our lives and believe that hippies are deranged psychopaths.
Why did Walt Disney produce a fraudulent documentary that told us Lemmings follow each other off cliffs? So we would believe it.
Why did The Beatles tell us to fear the taxman, to scoff at revolution, chase nonsense conspiracy theories, and that happiness is a warm gun? So we would believe it.
Why did Easy Rider tell us that the hippie movement was dead? So we would believe it.
Why did Chinatown end with defeatism in the face of massive corruption? So we would believe it.
Why did George Orwell tell us of a hellish future of totalitarian control that we are powerless to stop? So we would believe it.
Why did Wall Street tell us “greed is good”? So we would believe it.
Why did Do The Right Thing tell us we’re all racially tribalized? So we would believe it.
Why did Simpsons creator Matt Groening make a comic strip called Life in Hell? So we would believe it.
And on, and on, and on, and on. When it comes to any popular media, if you ask yourself the question, “Why would secret doomsday cult kleptocrats want the public to consume this?”, you will find your answers.
—
This is obviously very bad news, but the biggest lie we’ve been told is that we are powerless. We’ve got one way out of hellworld, and that’s for the public to realize that we’ve been conned completely so we can build a united movement that shatters every lie they’ve told us, mocks this rotten farce as loudly as it deserves, and aims at nothing short of abolishing our criminal government so we can build one that serves the public.
To understand this story is to see right through the con, to become immune to the endless sea of criminal propaganda, and to feel the great joy and power that comes with freedom.
If a small number of people quickly put on these truth-colored glasses, we are in for an unimaginably bright future. If not, we get an apocalypse.
For more information, I’ve put together this booklet that includes other major findings and a map to a sea of proof, along with all the other essays on this site.
For the true history of America since the end of World War II, see here.
To see this discovery unfold in real-time, along with further explanations, hundreds of pieces of evidence not covered here, advice, inspiration, political theory, and the heart and soul of a man escaping history’s largest doomsday cult, see my Instagram story highlights. I apologize for leaving things so scattered, but this has been an exhausting affair. So long as you understand this (true) ideology, you will be able to learn the whole story.
Here is a federal lawsuit I filed against dozens of perpetrators of the cryptocurrency Ponzi – not for litigation, but just to preserve the information and attach my name to it. I was terrified and hadn’t slept in days and it shows, but it served its purpose of keeping myself alive long enough to keep learning and telling this story.
I no longer have my original research files from the crypto rabbit hole. If you want to see them, you’ll have to get my laptop back from the government. Ask them how they got it – it’s a very fun story.
I hope you know how powerful you are. I wish you a hell of a lot more than luck.