After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story. More… https://t.co/uJtfsNTo37
The latest Daily Show Prep: Thursday, Oct. 24 dives deep into the recent media frenzy with a focus on debunking yet another Trump hit piece. This time, the Atlantic tried to smear Donald Trump with a false narrative about his military stance. But thanks to insider accounts, including those from former officials, the story has been thoroughly debunked. Even Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff stepped in to call out the falsehoods surrounding General Kelly’s statements. This breakdown offers a clear view of how the media continues to push these hit pieces without verifying facts. (Designed by AIPRM).
Pence’s Chief of Staff Debunks Trump Military Story
A key piece of evidence in this Trump hit piece debunked story comes from Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff. He publicly refuted General Kelly’s claims, stating outright that the narrative pushed by the Atlantic is entirely fabricated. In a world where fact-checking seems to be optional, it’s refreshing to see high-level officials standing up for the truth. The media’s role in spreading unverified information about Trump’s stance on the military has been under fire, and this new evidence only adds to the pressure.
9 in 10 Voters Demand Kamala Harris Transcript
Alongside the Trump hit piece debunked, the spotlight is also on CBS and its recent interview with Kamala Harris. Polls indicate that 9 out of 10 voters want the full transcript of her interview released. Trump is even considering suing CBS if the network refuses to release the entire interview. This comes after the FCC Commissioner hinted at a potential probe into CBS over the distortions made during the interview. The constant media manipulations, from Trump to Harris, are becoming clearer by the day.
Trump to Sue CBS Over Interview Manipulation?
Another important revelation in Trump hit piece debunked is Trump’s potential lawsuit against CBS. The network is accused of distorting his interview with Kamala Harris, leaving out key details that could swing public opinion. Trump is no stranger to legal battles, and this time he’s taking aim at media giants who continue to mislead the public. It’s a battle over transparency, and Trump isn’t backing down without a fight.
Harris Struggles with Word Salad Once Again
In a now-infamous CNN Town Hall, Kamala Harris fell into what many are calling “Word Salad City.” This latest blunder has only fueled public frustration. Paired with Liz Cheney’s dwindling political capital, the political landscape continues to shift. The Trump hit piece debunked reminds readers that the media isn’t just failing on Trump’s front, but also on accurately portraying Harris’ repeated stumbles during key moments.
MSNBC Fails to Push Racism Narrative with Black Voters
The Trump hit piece debunked post also highlights MSNBC’s failed attempt to stir the pot with Black women voters. The network’s push to frame certain issues as race-related didn’t resonate with the very group they were targeting. Voters are becoming increasingly savvy to media manipulation, and this recent failure only cements that notion. The lack of traction for these narratives showcases a growing demand for authentic reporting rather than manufactured outrage.
Veteran Kicked Off Delta Flight Sparks Outrage
Rounding off the Trump hit piece debunked, a story that is grabbing headlines involves a veteran who was kicked off a Delta flight for wearing a shirt advocating for suicide awareness among veterans. This incident has caused public outrage, raising questions about corporate policies and the treatment of those who have served. It’s yet another example of how social issues are intertwined with media narratives and how public opinion is often shaped by incomplete stories.
In conclusion, the latest issue of Daily Show Prep on Thursday, Oct. 24, effectively dismantles the recent media frenzy surrounding another Trump hit piece. By examining the facts and providing clarity, the show reinforces the importance of critical thinking in today’s media landscape. For those seeking to stay informed and engaged, be sure to follow my social media accounts for updates, insights, and more discussions on the pressing issues of our time. Join the conversation and empower yourself with the truth.
Most of you know I’ve been covering the actual science on COVID since December of 2019 with daily coverage starting January 14, 2020. My goal was to ensure my audience was informed of the latest on the virus so they could survive. That goal hasn’t changed.
Just as we had in December of 2019, we still have politicians, activists and the media either straight-up lying to you, or at the very least, peddling unverified information that isn’t true. As I’ve always said, the biggest problem with the media isn’t that they are sinister, it‘s that they are lazy.
For 15+ years I’ve covered the news media getting scientific stories and studies wrong. Sometimes this was to push a narrative. Other times it was simply that they didn’t understand the study’s conclusions or they went for the ‘if it bleeds, it leads’ strategy for clickbait.
The good news is that he feels great. The story should be ‘Joe Rogan gets COVID, feels great after treatment.’ That isn’t the story though. He must be sacrificed to the mask God Karen for the Cult of Mask. We must have his blood!
Enter Stuart Varney on Fox Business:
Fox Business segment slams Joe Rogan for taking ivermectin after Tucker Carlson pushed the horse dewormer
Ok, Dr. Bob Lahita now has no credibility to discuss this pandemic. None.
Dr. Lahita downplaying Ivermectin as a drug for cattle shows he isn’t in the loop about Ivermectin research over the past several years, even before the pandemic.
Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits.
Further down the line:
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
Wow! Fauci’s NIH has research on their site showing ivermectin works against COVID. Oh, the scandal!
COVID isn’t the first virus ivermectin has been studied to use as a treatment.
Also in the NIH article:
Since 2012, a growing number of cellular studies have demonstrated that ivermectin has antiviral properties against an increasing number of RNA viruses, including influenza, Zika, HIV, Dengue, and most importantly, SARS-CoV-2.9–17 Insights into the mechanisms of action by which ivermectin both interferes with the entrance and replication of SARS-CoV-2 within human cells are mounting.
We’ve been studying ivermectin to treat the flu, Zika, HIV Dengue Fever, etc. since 2012. The idea that using ivermectin to treat a virus is, to quote Dr. Bob Lahita, “ridiculous” is … well … ridiculous. Ivermectin is also approved for use in humans for parasitic worms and diseases and has been established as safe for humans in the right dosage. He’s not only wrong, but he’s also, at least, 9 years behind the science.
So, how does ivermectin work against certain viruses, like COVID?
For the SARS-CoV-2 virus to make you sick, it has to first infect your cells.
Then while inside the cell, the virus makes heaps of copies of itself, so it can spread around your body.
The virus also has ways of reducing the way your body fights the infection.
During the infection of the cell, some viral proteins go into the cell nucleus, and from here they can decrease the body’s ability to fight the virus, which means the infection can get worse.
To get into the nucleus the viral proteins need to bind a cargo transporter which lets them in.
Ivermectin can block the cargo transporter, so the viral proteins can’t get into the nucleus. This is how the scientists believe Ivermectin works against SARS-CoV-2 virus.
By taking Ivermectin, it means the body can fight the infection like normal, because its antiviral response hasn’t been reduced by the viral proteins.
Keep in mind, that’s Drugs.com, not some guy named Kyle with a blog. The article goes on to cite several studies where ivermectin saves lives fighting COVID.
This Stuart Varney segment reminded me of when Neil Cavuto, also of Fox Business, LIED to his audience about Hydroxychloroquine. Falsely claiming ‘you will die‘ if you took it. The Stuart Varney segment may not be as unhinged as the Cavuto nonsense but it was equally inaccurate. HCQ, like all medications, isn’t perfect and some patients shouldn’t take it depending on other health issues. Again, like every other medication on the planet. HCQ has only claimed the lives of 8 people from overdosing since the 1950s. It’s a safe drug as long as you don’t have any health issues that would suffer from taking it.
You have to ask why everywhere else in the world shows overwhelmingly positive results with HCQ but we don’t. Of course, the answer is most studies done in North America only use HCQ by itself in the late stages of COVID. In those circumstances, it’s only about 21% effective. For reference, the golden child, and very expensive, Remdesivir is only about 22% effective but is universally praised by the media, politicians, and medical community. Of course, Remdesivir’s maker, Gilead, has a lot of people in their pockets and was responsible for a lot of anti-HCQ propaganda. When I took the HCQ stack, my symptoms disappeared in 2 hours. Countless others have similar stories. Did it save my life? Probably not. It did make my recovery faster.
With the constant droning on about hospitalizations overwhelming communities, should we be focusing on inexpensive and effective treatments that keep people out of the hospital?
Just because a lab shows a result, doesn’t mean it works in the real world. However, we know HCQ worked in the real world because we had thousands of doctors who treated COVID patients daily attest to how well HCQ worked. The political class in the US chose to ignore those medical professionals, with more experience treating COVID than our own doctors, and instead ostracized them as quacks. At a time when we had nothing else, taking HCQ with azithromycin and zinc would have saved countless lives. The media, activists, politicians, and ill-informed public health officials needlessly let people die.
Are there better options than HCQ now? Yes. Ivermectin is one of them. Yet the media and ‘doctors’ who are way out of their depths are smearing it again in the middle of a surge in Delta variant COVID. They are repeating their mistakes and people will die because of their hubris.
