It is absolutely astounding how frequently I see stories like this. Usually, it’s from the man‘s perspective. Not this one.
As technology continues to advance in the sex toy industry to, finally, start accommodating men, more and more of them are choosing this option. It was always accepted and normalized for women to use these devices while men were stigmatized. Not so much anymore.
Many experts have predicted that men will utilize these ‘toys’ with more frequency to stay faithful. Futurists predict many will use the robotic versions to simply replace women. Ironically, feminists have boasted of replacing men since they now have artificial sperm. Yet, those same feminists are bothered by men replacing them. In Japan, an increasing number of young people are isolating themselves from society (Hikikomori) and turning away from sex and relationships with real people. For them, the sex dolls and robots are their primary form intimacy.
Source: A Wife Complains That Her Husband Replaced Her…With a Sex Doll – Brass Pills
I’m not sure what she expected. She, at least, seems aware she caused the problem. Frankly, he should be applauded for finding a solution that keeps him from stepping outside of his marriage. He did this, even though she has broken the marriage covenant (1 Corinthians 7:1-5). If there aren’t children involved, they should seek a divorce.
You’d be surprised how often I run across posts from women who admit frequently denying intimacy with their husbands suddenly get really offended when the husband returns the favor. The modern feminist attitude seems to be that women are entitled to sex on demand, men are not.
So long as we continue to see a society where men are constantly attacked, usually for things they didn’t do, we will continue to see more men retreat from intimacy with real women. They will take the path of least resistance. No amount of hypocritical and ludicrous feminist harping about how sex dolls/robots are actually victimizing women more will change that. It will only help advance the problem.
0 Comments