South Bend Common Council passes gun resolution, water rate hike
They hope to make it more difficult for people who are mentally ill, violent felons, and domestic abusers to get a gun.
Indiana Gun Control Laws – FindLaw
Who May Not Own 1. Convicted felon; 2. Drug abuser; 3. Alcohol abuser; 4. Mentally incompetent; 5. Under 18 (except if parent or guardian); 6. Convicted for any crime involving an inability to safely handle a handgun.
Medical marijuana ventures OK’d in Niles and Buchanan | Local | southbendtribune.com
Both Niles and Buchanan overwhelmingly approved resolutions Monday night to start the process of establishing the businesses.
FLASHBACK: DEBUNKED: Article Purporting Wounded Warrior Project is a ‘Legal Scam’ is False | TheBlaze.com
DEBUNKED: Article Purporting Wounded Warrior Project is a ‘Legal Scam’ is False | TheBlaze.com
FLASHBACK: Clinton Foundation Spends Just 5.7% On Charity, & Everyone’s A Hypocrite – The Burning Truth
Wounded Warrior took a media beating because of this story. Their ‘crime’ was to be accused of spending just 60% of their donations on veterans. That’s a full 54.3% MORE of their donations being used for their cause than the Clinton Foundation, and they were massacred by the media and public.
FLASHBACK: Wounded Warrior Project’s top execs fired amid lavish spending scandal | Fox News
Wounded Warrior Project’s top execs fired amid lavish spending scandal | Fox News
Wounded Warrior Project Exonerated After Vicious #FakeNews Smears by NY Times and CBS
The New York Times cited a report from charity auditor “Charity Navigator” that WWP spent “lavishly” on executives & administration rather than on vets. It turns out, the reporting was completely bogus, and just recently, WWP was afforded a 4-star rating by Charity Navigator, it’s top rating, for the fiscal year 2015. Of course, for the New York Times, the story is all that matters, regardless of who is hurt if the story is 100% BS. Wounded Warrior Project’s past finances were audited by FTI consulting and the Better Business Bureau. They found that there was NO “lavish spending” on the part of WWP and that the charity, in fact, gave 81% of contributions to injured vets.
0 Comments